Leeds: Marc Roca approves Elland Road move

Bayern Munich midfielder Marc Roca has said yes to a move to Leeds United, according to Sky Germany journalist Florian Plettenberg.

The Lowdown: Phillips competition

Phil Hay first broke the news regarding Leeds’ interest in Roca last week, claiming the club view the Spaniard as competition for Kalvin Phillips and not a direct replacement. The 6ft midfielder can play in holding or box-to-box roles, and a move has gathered pace in recent days.

Roca now looks set to become another early move for Jesse Marsch after Brenden Aaronson and Rasmus Kristensen, with details of the pending transfer now shared.

The Latest: Plettenberg’s big update

Plettenberg has been on top of the links regarding Leeds and Roca for Sky Sports Germany since the rumour broke last week.

He provided a big ‘update’ on Tuesday evening, revealing details of a medical, contract length and fee involved.

“Update Roca: Medical is scheduled for Friday, probably it will take place on Monday. Contract until 2026, transfer fee €12m guaranteed + €5m bonuses. In principle he said YES to Leeds in the last hours.”

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/latest-leeds-united-news-45/” title=”Latest Leeds United news!” poster=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/cropped-2022-03-10T184055Z_1834933207_UP1EI3A1FW561_RTRMADP_3_SOCCER-ENGLAND-LEE-AVA-REPORT-1-scaled-1.jpg” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

The Verdict: Good to see

The Whites always seemed to struggle to get transfer business done early in the window under Marcelo Bielsa, so it’s good to see that the club are being proactive this summer following a close shave with relegation last month, with moves for three players who all have Champions League experience.

Roca will be a welcome addition due to the club’s shortage of central midfielders, and should Phillips remain at Elland Road, the pair could well form a partnership in a potential 4-2-2-2 system under Marsch.

The Spaniard will be looking to play a leading role in Yorkshire after struggling for starts at Bayern, and you’d expect he may have been guaranteed regular game time by Marsch in order to say yes to a move.

In other news: Next step now taken on Kalvin Phillips leaving Leeds in big development. 

Crystal Palace in the mix to sign Lewis O’Brien

Crystal Palace are in the mix to pip Leeds United to the signing of midfielder Lewis O’Brien, according to TEAMtalk.

The Lowdown: O’Brien’s impressive campaign

O’Brien, described as ‘sensational’ by teammate Jonathan Hogg, was an ever-present figure for Huddersfield Town last season.

Primarily a central midfielder, the 23-year-old made 50 appearances in all competitions, turning out in seven different positions ranging from a defensive midfielder to a centre-forward.

O’Brien helped The Terriers to the Championship playoff final at Wembley, but Carlos Corberan’s side fell at the final hurdle. Now, it looks as if O’Brien could still make a move to the Premier League regardless.

The Latest: Palace in the mix

According to TEAMtalk journalist Graeme Bailey, O’Brien is destined to leave Huddersfield this summer and reportedly has a releasee clause in the region of £12m.

Leeds remain the big admirers of the midfielder, however, Palace have been name-checked as another side in the mix to secure O’Brien’s signature.

The Verdict: Needed?

Palace look fairly short of midfield options heading into Patrick Vieira’s second season in charge, so it shouldn’t come as a shock to see Steve Parish and Dougie Freedman eyeing possible additions in that area. The Eagles currently have five defensive and central midfielders on the books, two of which are out of contract at the end of June.

A replacement for Conor Gallagher may also be needed if the club can’t bring him back to Selhurst Park, so going after a player like O’Brien could be another wise move from a Championship club after deals for Eberechi Eze and Michael Olise.

In other news: Palace and Vieira eyeing ambitious move for rapid defender. 

Leeds: Hay drops Aaronson transfer update

Phil Hay has dropped an update on the future of reported Leeds United transfer target Brenden Aaronson.

What’s the word?

In a recent Q&A on The Athletic, the Leeds United correspondent revealed that the Red Bull Salzburg attacking midfielder – for whom Victor Orta saw first a £15m then a £20m offer rejected in the January transfer window – remains a target of the Whites’ Spanish sporting director this summer.

[snack-amp-story url=”https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-leeds-united-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-and-much-more” title=”Read the latest Leeds United news and rumours!”]

In response to a supporter’s question regarding Leeds’ potential summer transfer business, Hay said: “Aaronson is clearly someone they really want.”

Marsch will be buzzing

With Leeds rather desperately lacking a forward-thinking and creative central midfielder in their ranks, in addition to the fact that Jesse Marsch has previously worked with the USA international, it is not difficult to see why Orta would be keen to secure the signing of Aaronson this summer.

Indeed, the 21-year-old has been a constant livewire for Salzburg over his 24 Austrian Bundesliga appearances this season, with the £18m-rated talent bagging four goals, providing five assists and creating seven big chances for his teammates, as well as taking an average of 2.1 shots, making 1.6 key passes and completing 1.5 dribbles per game.

However, it was during the first-leg round of 16 Champions League tie against Bayern Munich in which the £19k-per-week sensation particularly caught the eye, with the 18-time capped international setting up Chukwubuike Adamu for Salzburg’s surprise opener with a deft touch on the edge of the box and drawing a fantastic save from Sven Ulreich after some incredibly tidy footwork in the Bayern penalty area, as well as completing five key passes, two dribbles and winning five duels over the course of the 90 minutes.

Furthermore, Aaronson’s 27.23 pressures per 90 over his eight appearances in the Champions League is enough to rank the 21-year-old in the top 1% of all attacking midfielders in Europe’s big five leagues in this particular metric over the last 365 days – something that clearly suits the way Marsch sets Leeds up tactically.

As such, while the signing of a player with as high a ceiling as the American will likely hinge on whether or not the Whites can secure survival in the Premier League this season, should they go on to do so, Orta simply must do everything in his power to bring the Salzburg starlet to Elland Road this summer, as Marsch would undoubtedly be buzzing to work with Aaronson once again.

AND in other news: “Very possible…”: Phil Hay drops big Leeds injury update, supporters will be buzzing

Immy's crowd

Sanjay Manjrekar looks back at his encounters with Imran Khan and the side he led, and the Sharjah matches of the ’90s

Sanjay Manjrekar08-Jan-2018My first day of international cricket in Pakistan is one I will never forget. It was the afternoon session in Karachi, Pakistan were batting and I was fielding at mid-on. Suddenly from behind me I heard someone muttering something about ‘Kashmir’ and ‘you Indians’. I looked back to see a person in a grey Pathani suit walk past me and head towards the pitch. He had just nonchalantly walked in with a Test match going on. When he reached the pitch, he started shouting anti-India slogans – basically, telling us we shouldn’t have come on tour. As the fielding team, we didn’t know what to do, so most of us just stayed in our places hoping that the people who were supposed to take care of such matters would do their job.The umpires tried to intervene, but the man went straight for the then Indian captain, Kris Srikkanth. The next thing we saw, to our utter shock and disbelief, was Srikkanth and the man exchanging blows. I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. Srikkanth was now holding him by his shirt, and there was pulling and tugging from both sides. It was a streetfight, except that it was happening during a Test match, and one of the persons involved was the India Test captain.Within seconds, a few other players joined the fight. The man was surrounded by the Indian players. I don’t clearly recall who all were there but Kiran More, always the team man, definitely got involved. I found it a little funny, watching More, with his pads on, trying to kick the intruder through all the legs and bodies that had surrounded him. It was also slightly amusing that the only fallout of this was Srikkanth going off the field for a couple of overs to change his shirt after he had lost all the buttons in the scuffle. The Test match continued as if nothing had happened. If this had happened today, the series would have been called off.We now know that such an incident is no laughing matter, but this was 1989 and those were different days. Pakistan was a different country. They were also a different cricket team, unlike any other team the world had seen. We got a sample of that even before the first Test started.Both the teams were practising in the evening session when we suddenly saw the legendary leg-spinner Abdul Qadir sprinting after a man. At first we wondered if that man was with the team, but he was a random spectator, one of the hundreds who had assembled at the National Stadium to watch us train. They had wandered onto the field as our practice went on. And there was Qadir, running after him as if his life depended on it. The rest of the crowd started to watch it and enjoy it. This man was younger and fitter than Qadir, and just as Qadir would get close to him, he would suddenly change direction. The chase went on for about five minutes. Both the teams stopped doing whatever they were doing, and began to watch this spectacle: a great leg-spinner running after a fan during a practice session before a Test match.Eventually the chase came to an end when the security joined in. Maybe Qadir was allowed to have a couple of swipes at the man before they let him go. The show was over, and we went back to our practice sessions. There was nothing in the papers the next morning either. We were later told by a Pakistan player – in a hush-hush manner – that the man had pinched Qadir’s bottom during the practice session.Pakistanis were known to be emotional cricketers. At times, they resembled a dysfunctional family, constantly quarrelling but coming together when it mattered. Undoubtedly, they had exceptional talent, but they needed a patriarch to bring them all together. That patriarch was my biggest take-away from that tour. When I came back from that tour, I was dying to tell my friends about the man who had now matched, perhaps surpassed, Sunil Gavaskar as my cricket idol.The author on his way to a half-century at the Old Trafford Test in 1990•Getty ImagesI could find no fault with Imran Khan Niazi. He had me even before hello. Those were the days when the Pakistan team was notorious for fielding thirteen men against the opposition – Shakoor Rana and Khizer Hayat or any of their two local umpires providing them great support. Call them patriotic if you wish, all their success at home had an asterisk attached to it. But Imran said, ‘No more.’ And in that big series against arch rivals India, he single-handedly ensured we had neutral umpires, John Hampshire and John Holder, both from England.It became clear that Imran had the will – and the necessary influence – to make such far-reaching changes to improve the perception of his team. He wanted the world to see his team beat India without help from the umpires. He was willing to risk losing in this endeavour, but as we found out over the next four Tests, it was not easy to beat a side led by such a fierce competitor.Imran was thirty-seven years old at the time. He had lost all his pace by then, but we never felt we could target him in the field or when he was bowling or when he batted. It was absolutely incredible watching him throughout that series. I don’t recall a single moment on the field on that trip when Imran’s attention drifted away from what was happening in the centre. We could be piling on the runs, it could be a long hot day in the field, but there was not one moment where you could see him looking in the direction of the stands or seeming bored. His eyes were always focused on what was happening on the field.Things obviously didn’t go as per plan for Pakistan as we managed to draw all the four Tests of that series. Barring the last Test in Sialkot, we got flat pitches everywhere. They started off being green but went back to their natural state as the match went on. There were a lot of overs to be bowled on long, hard days. Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis were the new pace sensations, but Imran knew they needed to be used sparingly as strike weapons; they had to be preserved as out-and-out quicks should be. Waqar had some fitness issues, so he played only two Tests. Imran, though, kept running in ball after ball on those flat pitches with the old ball, and sent down 185.3 overs in that series. On either side, only Wasim bowled more than Imran.It was not just the number of overs he bowled, it was his intensity that stood out. Imran was a metronome as a bowler. Primarily, he was a major in-swing bowler so his aim used to be to start wide outside off and end up on the off stump. He did that for almost every ball for the 25-30 overs he bowled every day. On the odd occasion that the ball finished on the middle stump and I was able to flick it for runs on the leg side, he would get absolutely livid with himself. I would then get to hear him utter the choicest of abuses in Punjabi and English. Even if it was just one run to square leg, the fact that he had allowed the batsman to play on the leg side was a big failure in his opinion. He was merciless on himself, and he expected the same from others.In Lahore, when I was taking a single to bring up my double-century, I could hear Imran berating the bowler for allowing me to get an easy one on the leg side. I don’t remember whether he applauded when I reached the landmark. Later in the series when Shoaib Mohammad was about to reach his landmark we had Srikkanth and More bowling.I remember there was a match where we got confused if it was a one-day international or an exhibition game. With no agreement forthcoming, one team started out playing thinking it was a serious match, and the other team played it like an exhibition match. With Imran in one of the teams, you didn’t need to guess which side took the game seriously. So we had Srikkanth clowning around with the ball, doing impressions of Qadir’s action, and Imran watching it all with a deadpan expression. After bowling a long hop at Imran, Srikkanth smiled, but Imran just stared back with a straight face.Wasim Akram: a bowling genius shaped by Imran•Getty ImagesIn the Faisalabad Test, Sachin Tendulkar got a light feather of a touch on the ball as he looked to work it off his hip. It was such a faint edge that no one appealed. Except Imran Khan, who was at mid-on. The umpire shook his head, but Imran was convinced there was some bat in that one. He kept asking his players how come they didn’t hear it. ‘ [there was definitely a sound],’ he kept saying before he reluctantly dragged his feet back to mid-on.At the end of the over, Tendulkar and I got together and he said, ‘What a guy. What sharp ears.’ He knew he had edged it. The wicketkeeper didn’t hear it, the umpire didn’t hear it, but the man at mid-on did. No one was as focused on the game as Imran was.The cricket field was a place where Imran would let himself go. Captaining a team known for rustic behaviour, he would become the biggest rascal of them all. His cursing was a big part of his cricket. We knew he studied at Oxford and spoke charmingly, but it was a sight to behold when he let it rip at himself or his team-mates in the language of the common Pakistani man. Wasim and Waqar imitate Imran brilliantly. Whenever Wasim does it, a generous dose of swear words is a big part of the script. Imran truly felt at home on a cricket field, and expressed himself without a filter.That he could connect with everyone in his team was a reason why he led Pakistan so successfully. They were a difficult side to lead. A side whose superstar batsman Javed Miandad enjoyed so much influence that he could ask for and get a flat pitch in Lahore for his hundredth Test despite his captain’s wish to play on surfaces that help his young sensational quicks.Because of the flat pitches, a typical Test for Imran would mean bowling 35-40 overs in an innings as we scored 400 or upwards. In the ten-minute break between innings, Imran – a lower-middle- order batsman – would come out all padded up to have a knock. He would repeat it in every break – lunch, tea – while his team batted. He would always have his full gear on as he came out for the knock.On occasion if my eye wandered towards the dressing rooms when Pakistan were batting, I could see Imran fooling around with either the bat or the ball as he sat in the balcony. We had one such player in our dressing room too, but he was sixteen years old and on his first international tour. Imran, meanwhile was thirty-seven, and had been an international cricketer for eighteen years by then.Imran’s methods as captain made so much sense. It may have looked crude at times but it was effective especially given Pakistan’s temperament. He could sense when a batsman was losing concentration; he would send out messages through substitutes. He could see an event before it happened and avert disasters.There was no one in the Indian team to do such things. To be fair, Sandeep Patil did that to us, but only at the Ranji level. As a commentator, I once suggested M.S. Dhoni to become more hands on, to get into the head of someone like Umesh Yadav, to use a combination of Yadav’s skill and fitness and Dhoni’s brain. For this is what I had seen Imran do from mid-on with Wasim and Waqar.The sweet smell of Sharjah success: Saleem Malik, Imran Khan, Wasim Akram and Javed Miandad celebrate with the Austral-Asia Cup trophy in 1990•Ben Radford/Getty ImagesThere are great stories of how Imran used to mentor the young fast bowlers. *Once, Waqar was driven past mid-on by a batsman, past Imran. Imran didn’t exactly fancy chasing the ball, which pulled up inches outside the boundary. Imran came all the way back with the ball in his hand and asked Waqar, ‘Vicky, what did you do there?’Waqar replied, ‘Skipper, I tried to bowl an inswinger to him.’ Imran threw up his arms in the air, and cried out to Waqar, ‘, ask me before you do any such thing.’A young bowler once stood at the top of his run and didn’t run in right away. After a few seconds passed, Imran shouted at him from mid-on, ‘Why aren’t you bowling?’ The reply was: ‘You didn’t tell me what to bowl.’Both Tendulkar and I were so inspired by Imran’s and then the South African way of bowling – machine-like outside the off stump and waiting for the batsmen to make mistakes – that we copied those styles when we played for Mumbai. We had an incredible time doing that. We destroyed all our opposition this way. All Mumbai bowlers bowled every ball as per our directives. They were the better for it. It was only when Ajit Agarkar came along in my last year as Mumbai captain that I felt I didn’t need to tell him anything.As with the great West Indies players, Imran wanted to play the game the right way. In 1992, we played Pakistan in a series of three matches in England to raise funds for Imran’s hospital. The first was played at Crystal Palace in London. Even though they were exhibition matches, the fervour among fans did not diminish. If anything, they got a freer hand than at international matches. There were pitch invasions and missiles. The 42-over contest was reduced to 40, and eventually 25. Pakistan needed 69 runs in 7.5 overs when their fans made another invasion, forcing the organizers to abandon the game. At the post-match presentations, Imran grabbed the microphone and announced that India had won this game and said the Pakistan fans’ behaviour was shameful.In my first personal encounter with Imran, I was afraid I had infuriated my hero similarly. This was from a Sharjah tour before we went to Pakistan in 1989. We were at the ground for an India-Pakistan match. I was taking a knock before the match when I hit a ball that went in the direction of some Pakistani journalists standing just outside the boundary. It nearly cleaned out one of them as they all ducked for cover. One of them shouted at me, ‘Play these shots in the match, not here.’I was a young hothead then, and saw this remark as one coming from someone who was part of the dominant camp in Sharjah. Pakistan were a superb side respected all over the world, and when it came to Sharjah they were the kings. Teams just turned up in Sharjah to take their beating from Pakistan. The Indian team went there twice a year, so I guess we bore the brunt more than the others. That’s why I thought that the offended journalist was being arrogant.That made me angry, and I told him he should be in the press box and not in the ground. The journalist was in no mood to step back, and we had a spat. Raman Lamba had to intervene and drag me away. The matter didn’t end there, though. At the Sharjah Cricket Stadium you have to walk through a common lounge area to get to your respective dressing rooms. As I walked back through there, one of my team-mates asked me what had happened, and I said, ‘Nothing, just some Pakistani rascal trying to act smart.’Then I felt a tap on my shoulder, and that unmistakable loud booming voice told me, ‘Don’t be so anti-Pakistani.’Months later, when I was in awe of Imran during that Pakistan tour, I was always reminded of how I had begun on the wrong foot with my hero. I wondered if Imran held that against me still. I wondered if that was the reason he swore at his bowler for letting me take the 200th run easily in Lahore. I wondered if I could ever be on friendly terms with Imran.The 1989 tour came and went. Imran didn’t speak a word to me on the field through the four Tests. Once the series was over, though, Imran was lavish in his praise for me on every public platform. I realized now that to Imran the Sharjah incident might have been so trivial he possibly didn’t even remember it. As with all great ambassadors of the game, it was good cricket that mattered to him. To get such admiration from my idol was the biggest prize for my performance in Pakistan.Our next interaction came after I had a lukewarm tour of New Zealand. The moment he saw me he asked me, ‘Why did you play Richard Hadlee off the back foot?’ He told me I played Wasim and Waqar well because I was looking to move forward all the time. While it was sound technical advice, I was just floored that my hero liked my batting enough to follow that tour and be disappointed with my failures. This was a Pakistani following the progress of an Indian and wanting him to do well.I was not the only one. This was the time Maninder Singh had developed the yips and had lost his run-up, his action, his zip. A prodigious talent with a beautiful action, Maninder was a shadow of himself now. After speaking to me, Imran headed straight to Maninder and asked him, ‘Manni, what have you done to your bowling? Why did you change your action? There is no run-up now, nothing.’Maninder tried to reason with him by saying he had lost his accuracy and had to shorten his run-up to regain the control, but Imran was having none of it. ‘If I lose my accuracy I can’t shorten my run-up,’ Imran said. ‘I will lose all my pace. This is not done. Go back to the original run-up and keep bowling at one stump, a thousand balls a day, and you will find your accuracy.’Imran was not born to be a great. He had to work hard and put himself through tremendous grind to achieve greatness. Plus, he was a generous man to boot. These are the people who have a lot of cricket wisdom to share and pass on rather than the ridiculously talented cricketers.Waqar Younis bowls in the Wills Trophy in Sharjah in October 1991, a tournament that, like many others at the venue, Pakistan won•Getty ImagesRamiz Raja once told me that if Imran had been my captain he would have never dropped me and would have ensured that I succeeded at all cost. He was that kind of a leader. If he believed in someone, he backed that player fully. Inzamam-ul-Haq was a beneficiary of Imran’s trust. Even before Imran took him to the World Cup in Australia and New Zealand, Imran had announced to the world that they had found the next great batsman. When Inzamam failed at No. 3 in the 1992 World Cup, the thirty-nine-year-old Imran pushed himself up to No. 3 but never dropped Inzamam, who eventually won them the semi-final against New Zealand.Imran and the other seniors around him had incredible self-belief. They thought their team was second to none, no matter where they played or against whom they played. There weren’t too many around in India to do what Imran did for Inzamam.Imran also knew his players inside out. Ramiz told me how he would settle differences within the team. There was this one time when Saleem Yousuf and Javed Miandad got into a bit of a fight on the field. They were both strong characters, and neither man was willing to take a step back. During the lunch break, an upset Miandad went up to Imran and said that either Yousuf was going to stay on the tour or he was; that the team was too small for both Yousuf and him.Imran listened to him and said, ‘, Javed [Javed, you are impossible]’ Imran then laughed and left. That was it. That was the end of the fight. It was incredible. With any other captain, who knows how much this issue would have escalated. Imran, though, knew Javed well enough to handle him the way he did, and he also had the stature and the intelligence to trivialize this threat.Ramiz has often told me he never ever heard one negative thought expressed in the Pakistan dressing room during Imran’s tenure as captain. He still wonders where Imran got the confidence from to say they were going to win the World Cup the moment they landed in Australia in 1992. Even when Pakistan played West Indies, they would go in with positivity. Not one defensive word was said. He spread this positivity all around.It will forever be my regret that we had no Imran-like senior in our dressing room. Youngsters like Kiran More and Manoj Prabhakar would have gained a lot under Imran; they were the kind of players Imran backed. Ijaz Ahmed once batted conservatively at the end of an ODI innings, and came back with a score of 30-odd not out. Imran told him he would be sent back home if he put his personal interests ahead of the team ever again. In India, meanwhile, More found himself batting higher in the order against formidable attacks because more accomplished senior players chose to take the easy way out by dropping themselves down the order.Similarly, Prabhakar ended up opening with the bat in 23 of his 39 Tests. These two were also a little Pakistani when it came to temperament. Contrary to the narrative of a bitter rivalry between the India and Pakistan teams, we got along pretty well. The rivalry was more among the fans, who were in each other’s faces, and the media. In Pakistan in 1989 for over two months, there was not a single instance of any fight or a face-off between the players – except that Prabhakar and More always tried getting under the skin of Miandad, who was not one to take it lying down. The unforgettable More-Miandad incident that we saw in the 1992 World Cup was at least three years in the making.

****

It’s not as if Pakistan were the most cohesive unit of all time, but at least it was more fun than malice. Their turning on each other in full public view – and they did so endearingly – made them a fun side to watch. It was loud when you went out to bat against Pakistan, but the noise would be their elders sledging each other. They would quarrel with each other on the field. They were constantly at each other when Imran wasn’t near.There were no glares or shrugs of shoulders at misfields, only the choicest abuse, especially from Imran. I would be memorizing the great one-liners to repeat them to my friends once I got back – I’d imagine how thrilled they would be when I told them of how Imran behaved on the field.Miandad would constantly be in Imran’s ear with this advice or the other. Imran would at best tolerate him. I never saw Imran listen to advice from Miandad – a great in his own right – seriously. I never saw Miandad let up either. Then when it would get too much, you would hear Imran’s booming voice: ‘ Javed [You let it be, Javed. You give one advice one moment, and something completely different the next moment].’ Miandad would go back to the slip cordon muttering under his breath that things would be better if done his way.Somebody once asked Imran if Miandad’s advice ever worked for him and Pakistan at an important stage in any match. Imran’s reply was that if somebody gave you a thousand suggestions a day, one or two were bound to work.At times, it would get comical, but Pakistan knew how to win matches. That’s where India and Pakistan were different at that time. We just carried with us a lot of self-doubt and negativity when we left our shores. While we would easily lose to England in England, Pakistan would go there and hammer them. In 1992, two years after our tour of England, Pakistan came and not only thrashed England but also beat all counties outright in the side games only because there was a financial jackpot to be won if any team did that.Even when we went to Sharjah, known for its flat pitches, it seemed we were there just to accept our punishment. Indeed, Sharjah was where the India-Pakistan rivalry would grow in intensity, perhaps thanks to the Pakistani fans in Sharjah. From the moment we landed at the airport, they would be in our faces. At the hotel, at the restaurants, at the shopping centres, and in the ground where the stands were so close to the playing area it seemed they could stretch their arms and touch us. Chants of ‘, Pakistan [Long live Pakistan]’ haunted us everywhere.Other than that, especially now that I look back, playing Pakistan was not as tough as people think. All the drama and the tension, the history between the two nations, the emotion that came with the matches, were external. As players, we weren’t nearly as intense or edgy about facing off against each other as the fans were. In fact, we played against each other so many times that it eased our equation a bit.Playing Pakistan was a far easier challenge than playing England, South Africa or Australia in their backyards. For starters, you played them mostly in Asia, many times in Sharjah – the flattest pitches you could get. I don’t rate batting performances in Sharjah very highly. I once got the Man of the Series award there. It’s not something I wear as a badge of honour.HarperCollinsThere used to be a graveyard near the Sharjah Stadium. Every time we travelled to the ground, I used to wonder if the signage pointing towards the graveyard should actually point towards the ground; it was after all a graveyard for bowlers. ‘Sharjah Stadium, where great bowlers’ spirits come to die.’ I once lofted Curtly Ambrose straight over his head in Sharjah. His next ball to me was a slower ball on my pads. It was like a tiger had been reduced to eating grass. That’s what Sharjah did to bowlers, barring, of course, the Pakistani bowlers.Off the field, though, there used to be a lot of glamour in Sharjah. Film stars, pop stars and other famous and infamous faces would often be seen in the luxurious boxes. We were – at least I was – blissfully unaware of what might have gone on under the surface. All I knew back then was that India versus Pakistan was a big draw, which is why we were invited to Sharjah and to other exhibition matches over and over again.The exhibition matches were played in a light-hearted vein but would witness spurts of intense competition, often on an individual level. Take the instance of Javed Miandad and Dilip Vengsarkar – both quite similar as people, which is why they were friendly off the field. However, in one such exhibition match on the 1989 tour, Waqar bowled a lovely outswinging yorker that pitched on the base of Vengsarkar’s off stump and sent it cartwheeling. I was at the non-striker’s end, and I saw Vengsarkar was a little shaken up by the rookie’s excellent bowling.I got out shortly after, and I was having tea with Vengsarkar when Miandad walked straight towards him. And without any pleasantries, Miandad told Vengsarkar, ‘You have had a long career. There was only one thing missing: “b Waqar Younis”. You have now achieved that too.’Vengsarkar tried to ignore this taunt, but when needled further he told Miandad that he had just walked in to bat and didn’t see the ball properly. Miandad would have nothing of it, and kept on insisting that the kid was a terrific bowler. ‘He has done this to quite a few very good batsmen, so don’t feel so bad,’ Miandad said.After Miandad left, Vengsarkar conceded that Waqar was indeed a damn good bowler.Waqar was not the only young talent that emerged from those exhibition matches on that tour. The story of Tendulkar hitting Qadir out of the park is also quite well known, but I saw the best of Tendulkar in those matches when he played Wasim Akram. Perhaps Tendulkar played more freely on such occasions, considering these were not ODIs. Tendulkar versus Wasim with both at their prime is perhaps the best rivalry that never was. Those matches were not on TV, but from my ringside view I saw Tendulkar dominate Wasim. I remember how Mudassar Nazar observed during one such exhibition match – the best slog-overs bowler in the world was hit all over the park by Tendulkar quite effortlessly. Tendulkar will never boast openly, but he used to often wonder why other batsmen found Wasim so tough to play. I used to think, ‘Because you are not like other batsmen, Sachin.’Because Tendulkar had captured the imagination of the cricket world, and because I had had a good series, we would be recognized anywhere we went. I had seen a lot of Pakistan players wear a certain kind of sandal – especially Imran – and I had to buy them. So at the end of the tour, both of us went to a market in Peshawar. We reached a narrow street lined up on both sides with just sandal shops. As we looked in a few stores, word spread that we were there. The street soon filled up with hundreds of people, all gaping at us. I have mixed feelings about that experience. It was nice to see the effect we were having on people, and it was our first real experience of what it was like to be famous, but at the time I’d felt a little vulnerable because I had seen the hostility from Pakistan fans in Sharjah. Here, though, they just looked at us, two India cricketers, in awe. Nobody hassled us. I got my sandals, I liked them a lot, and I didn’t have to pay for them.Imperfect07:50:42 GMT, January 8, 2018: *The original said this incident was from Pakistan’s tour of England in 1990, which is incorrect

The Rahul v McClenaghan subplot

Plays of the day from Mumbai Indians’ six-wicket win over Royal Challengers Bangalore at the Wankhede Stadium

Shashank Kishore20-Apr-2016McClenaghan v Rahul: Part I
KL Rahul, playing his first match this season, would have hoped for a smooth initiation. Instead, he was put through a proper short-ball examination by Mitchell McClenaghan. The fast bowler’s first ball smashed the side of Rahul’s helmet with the opener late to sway out of the way. The impact threw him off balance, but he recovered quickly to complete a leg bye. Shaken but not stirred, Rahul held his shape and negotiated four more short balls in the over without much trouble.McClenaghan v Rahul: Part II
In testing the bounce offered by the surface, McClenaghan perhaps became predictable. Rahul was ready for the short-ball barrage in his second over. Rahul backed away and slapped the first ball he faced for six. McClenaghan wasn’t in the mood to back down and he sent down another bouncer. This time, Rahul arched back to ramp it over the wicketkeeper. Then came a delicious ball on leg stump, which he whipped behind square for four. The last ball was floated wide, and Rahul poked and nicked it, Harbhajan Singh gleefully accepting the catch at slip.The reprieve
AB de Villiers bunted Harbhajan to short midwicket and set off for a single in the seventh over. He was halfway down the pitch when he realised Virat Kohli was ball-watching. Harbhajan, oblivious to the mid-pitch drama, collected Rohit Sharma’s throw and was looking to break the stumps at the bowler’s end when he heard Parthiv Patel’s call of “keeper, keeper”. By then, it was too late as de Villiers dived full-length to make his ground. The reprieve cost Mumbai Indians 22 runs.Krunal’s ‘slinga’ flop
Trying to bowl with a slinging action, Krunal Pandya fired a full delivery on a sixth-stump line down the leg side. When the frame was frozen on his delivery stride, his action resembled a javelin thrower gearing up for his final thrust. The ball beat the batsman as well as the diving wicketkeeper, and went for five wides. Krunal put his hand up to calm a fuming Parthiv. He later said he had been practicing the delivery in the nets.Rayudu’s lucky break
Parthiv was dismissed in the second over of Mumbai’s innings. Ambati Rayudu could have followed him in the next over. Instead, Royal Challengers Bangalore conceded four overthrows to Rohit. Both batsmen set off for a suicidal single after Rohit pushed Varun Aaron straight to backward point. Travis Head fired at the striker’s end and missed the stumps. He could have given himself a better chance had he paused for a second or two before throwing, since Rayudu was still barely halfway down the pitch. Rayudu’s second-wicket stand with Rohit laid the platform for Mumbai’s successful chase.

Dropped catches, and a dropped shoe

Plays of the day from the Group B game between Ireland and Zimbabwe in Hobart

Brydon Coverdale in Hobart07-Mar-2015Drop of the day
There were so many to choose from on a miserable day in the field for Zimbabwe, but the really costly miss came when Ed Joyce top-edged a pull off Tawanda Mupariwa in the 20th over. The ball flew high out towards midwicket and the bowler was the man with the best chance of making it; Mupariwa did just that, but misjudged slightly and the ball ricocheted off his fingers and into the turf. Despite the distance he had to cover it was very catchable. It was also very costly; Joyce was on 34 at the time, and went on to make 112.Catch of the day
The contrast in the fielding of both sides was stark until a few nervous fumbles from Ireland later in the chase. It was particularly notable when William Porterfield clasped a much harder skied chance than the one that Mupariwa had put down. Porterfield had to run back from point, with the flight of the ball, and he judged it perfectly as the ball sailed down over his left shoulder and straight into his hands.Anti-climax of the day
There were a few aborted cheers and mystified faces in the Bellerive Oval crowd when Tinashe Panyangara yorked Joyce in the 29th over. The stumps splayed, the bails lit up, but Joyce was going nowhere. The umpire had signalled it was a free hit for Joyce after Panyangara overstepped on the previous delivery, which, incidentally, Joyce had slashed over cover for four.Sub of the day
Stuart Matsikenyeri must be sick of the sight of Ireland. At the 2007 World Cup, it was Matsikenyeri who failed to connect to the last-ball full toss that resulted in a tie between the two teams. In the 2015 World Cup, Matsikenyeri was not picked, but was on the field as 12th man when Kevin O’Brien drove uppishly to cover on 5. Matsikenyeri not only spilled a chance he should have taken, he also suffered the indignity of his shoe falling off in the process. At the end of the over Chamu Chibhabha came back on to the field and a disappointed Matsikenyeri jogged off.Kick of the day
As the chase entered the tense final five overs, it looked like Regis Chakabva and Sean Williams might have misjudged a leg bye. Chakabva tried to work Alex Cusack to leg but the ball flew off his pad out to cover. Niall O’Brien ran in and soccered the ball at the stumps at the non-striker’s end but missed by a large margin, allowing two important overthrows, or overkicks.

IPL: The fascination of the abomination

There are plenty of things to dislike about the IPL, but the cricket certainly isn’t one of them

Peter Miller, United Kingdom03-Apr-2013When Conrad wrote those immortal words in , his masterpiece deriding cultural imperialism and all its ills, he was without doubt predicting the arrival of T20 cricket, and more specifically the Indian Premier League. The IPL is like a crazy ex-girlfriend. You never want to see her again, but you still check her Facebook status when no one is looking.I don’t want to know the shirt sponsor of the Chennai Super Kings, but I do. I wish I had no idea how much Glenn Maxwell is earning, but it appears in my mind anyway. Like Alcatraz, there is no escape. You want to be able to tell people, “Oh, I never watch it, it isn’t proper cricket.” But to do so would be lying.As time goes by, I find myself more in tune with the cadence of Twenty20 cricket. While it doesn’t have the ebb and flow of Test cricket, it has moments of the most intense drama. That these periods of high tension are hidden amongst games between two teams where someone finishes third makes them all the more exciting when they do happen. While a Hashim Amla Test innings is finesse and beauty, a Chris Gayle innings is power and bravado. Both have their place, they are two sides of the same ceremonial IPL coin, which is also available to purchase via auction on the IPL site.So why am I embarrassed about watching the IPL? Why do I hide behind snobbish mockery? For the same reason I would not like to be seen reading a Dan Brown novel on the train – it does not fit in with the picture I have of myself. I like to think of myself as a cricket connoisseur. If you asked me about my favourite innings of all time, I would tell you it was Michael Atherton’s marathon 185 not out at Johannesburg in 1995 – a full 645 minutes and 492 balls of gritty determination.Where the IPL never fails to annoy is the way that those who promote and commentate on the event talk of it as the most important thing to happen in the field of sport. It is a hit and giggle tournament that is there to entertain. It is not an Ashes test, the Wimbledon final or the 100 metres at the Olympics. To give it the same hype as something that a sportsman has worked his entire life for is to patronise the viewer and demean the player.The thing about the IPL that I find hardest to stomach is the relentless commercialism of the event. If you stand still long enough at an IPL stadium you will have 14 different sponsors bedecking your shirt. There are sponsored sixes, sponsored catches, sponsored “moments of success”. The only thing that gets more screen time that Sachin Tendulkar is the car on the boundary that the players are competing for. If the sponsors believe that a newly made millionaire in his twenties is looking for a reliable family car they may be sadly mistaken.I long to live in a world where sport takes place in a vacuum, where commercial realities are a grubby necessity confined to other fields. This is a dream about as likely to come true as the one I regularly have involving Angelina Jolie, Emma Stone and a hot tub.So I will watch the IPL. I will make jokes about MS Dhoni and N Srinivasan’s relationship and about Tendulkar getting bowled. I will be made nauseous by the commercialism and the faux sincerity. But more than that, I will enjoy the all-too-rare moments of pure drama and try not to feel too superior. I might fail at the last bit.If you have a submission for Inbox, send it to us here, with “Inbox” in the subject line

The heart of Sydney

The SCG, which clocks its 100th Test this week, has been a cultural hub of the city and a symbol of it like no other

Norman Tasker02-Jan-2012As an enduring symbol of Sydney, the SCG predates the Harbour Bridge and the Opera House by a good margin. Sydney is a city in which sport, in general, and cricket in particular, have been a large part of the common culture, and for generations of devotees the grand old ground has remained its cultural hub.There is an aura to it. The Members’ Stand clock seems almost to record timelessness. From way back in 1882, when Billy Murdoch’s Australians defeated England in the first two Tests played there, until the 100th this week, the ghosts of greatness have been ever-present.My experience of the Sydney Cricket Ground dates back to the 1950s, though somehow the relationship seems a lot longer than that. For years as a young cricket writer I listened to the tales of the 1930s that Alan McGilvray would tell with relish, often over a bottle of Scotch. I shared the press box with giants like Bill O’Reilly and Jack Fingleton, whose stories of Bodyline and Bradman were irresistible.At the top of their list of stellar SCG batting performances was the memorable effort of Stan McCabe, whose 187 not out in the first Test of the 1932-33 Ashes series resisted all that Bodyline could throw at him. Many thought it the best innings ever played at the ground. McCabe hit 25 fours in that innings, many of them hooked as the ball rocketed to him at eye level. Many thought McCabe’s offensive against such lethal bowling might well have stopped the Bodyline tactic in its tracks. Sadly, it was not to be.The Bradman era at the SCG must have been a marvellous time, when the word would go out that he was on his way to the crease, and people would flood in from all over town. Sometimes the crowd grew three- and four-fold, such was his appeal. Since then the ground has necessarily changed in its nature as well as its function. The old green-roofed stands have shrunk, as the Bob Stand, the Sheridan Stand and the old Brewongle have been enveloped by modern imperatives.The Hill has gone, too, and with it a part of Sydney that was unique. Until the Bradman Stand went up in the 1970s there was vast open space at both ends of the ground. It was commonplace for rugs to be spread on the grass, weighed down by an Esky full of beer. When World Series Cricket came upon us in 1978, the light towers went up, to the dismay of many. People appeared in coloured clothing to play a brash new type of night cricket, and thousands flocked to watch. The objectors of 1978 would marvel at the Big Bash League today.Night and day, the SCG was a social hub for a sporting fraternity of all persuasions. In the Members’ and the Noble stands everybody seemed to know everybody. If Keith Miller wasn’t holding court, grabbing each of his limitless mates as they entered, somebody else was. You were never short of a beer and a laugh and a story of great days past.In the outer it was much the same. There was a character to the Hill that was captivating. Shirtless young men would gather in great numbers, downing beers under the benign gaze of policemen who seemed only to envy them. Occasionally they would put together a chain of beer-can ringtops that would stretch from third man to cover point. There was often a record to be chased.To Englishmen the Hill was a bizarre place that captured the Australian nature. On one tour in the early 1970s, Brian Bearshaw of the insisted on savouring the experience, so we went up under the old scoreboard and stripped to the waist like everybody else. Bearshaw started the day a pale and ghostly white and finished it lobster red. He never ventured to the Hill again.For much of the 20th century the SCG was the home of all of Sydney’s major sports. Rugby Tests were played there. Rugby League used it as its home ground. In days when the ground was less well drained it would often be an absolute mud heap.

Everybody seemed to know everybody. If Keith Miller wasn’t holding court, grabbing each of his limitless mates as they entered, somebody else was. You were never short of a beer and a laugh and a story of great days past

The Bulli soil that came from the south coast of NSW to form the SCG pitch was black and fertile, and made for famously hard wickets. But when it churned up late in the football season, as it did for some famous grand finals, there was precious little time to get it ready for the cricket. Somehow they always did.The memories of great days remain vivid. My first experience covering cricket for the as a very young journalist was a NSW Sheffield Shield game against Queensland, when Ian Craig hit 146, Neil Harvey scored 229, and the home side was 424 for 2 at stumps on the first day. O’Neill, Thomas, Benaud, Davidson and Johnny Martin were all to follow.This was late 1960, when Australia and West Indies were about to lock horns in the most magical Test series of all. A tie in Brisbane and thrilling contests in Melbourne and Adelaide made the series legendary, but Sydney was no less memorable thanks to an innings of 168 by the great Garfield Sobers.To this day I have in my mind’s eye one shot in that innings that remains indelible. Ian Meckiff was hurling them down at great pace from the Randwick end. Sobers went on to the back foot, stood tall with one leg raised, and punched him on to the concourse between the main Randwick Hill and the old Sheridan stand for six. I haven’t seen better in the 50 years since.Through the 1960s and into the 1970s, Doug Walters was a perennial SCG favourite, as much for the way he played as for the results he achieved. They named a stand in his honour – at first unofficial, as a measure of the crowd’s affection for him, and later official – and the ground lit up whenever he was at the crease.He scored 242 and 103 in the fifth Test against West Indies in 1969, in his most productive home performance after Australia had been put in to bat. It stood in stark contrast to his captain, Bill Lawry, whose first-innings 151 took over eight hours. Lawry also refused to enforce the follow-on despite a first-innings lead of 340, then pushed the match into a sixth day by leaving West Indies 735 to score in the final innings. Australia won the Test by 382 runs, and thus the series.One of the more dramatic days at the SCG came during the hastily arranged seventh Test of 1970-71, when the formidable English fast bowler John Snow caught the Australian tailender Terry Jenner on the head with a bouncer. These were days before helmets, and bowling bouncers at tailenders was considered poor form. When Snow was within range of the fence at the Paddington End, a spectator grabbed him in retribution. The England captain, Ray Illingworth, was furious as beer cans rained on to the field; he took his players off and left batsmen Greg Chappell and Jenner standing forlornly at the wicket.Illingworth had taken his action without the permission of the umpires, technically forfeiting the match as the recently retired No. 1 umpire Colin Egar was happy to tell everybody in the Noble bar. Furious negotiations in the dressing room got them all back on the field and England went on to win a Test that, had people reacted differently, might well have been taken from them.The SCG today: on the opening day of the Big Bash League•Getty ImagesThe ground has seen much more high drama over its 100 Tests. Through the eras of Lillee and Marsh, Border and Taylor, Warne and McGrath, Waugh and Ponting, the cavalcade of superstars has continued to leave an indelible mark on a remarkable ground. The great Brian Lara made his first appearance there as a 23-year-old in January 1993, and made 277 runs in classical fashion before being run out. The game was drawn, but a new young champion of extraordinary talent had announced himself.The football codes, too, have offered plenty down the years. In 1965, nearly 80,000 people somehow got into the ground for a Rugby League grand final. They perched themselves on the roof of the old Bob Stand and anywhere else they could find a spot. It was scary stuff.The Sydney Cricket Ground will see many more great days. It is a space that has always been central to the character of Sydney. That is not likely to change.

Agricultural, impure, glorious

That Netherlands conquered a complacent England was not simply arrogance on the part of their hosts, but the benefits of relying on the basics

Will Luke06-Jun-2009Well. Of all the teams to beat, they beat England. Of all the teams to lose to! How was it Netherlands? Those questions and much more besides will be ringing joyfully in Dutch ears, painfully in England’s, after the lowly amateurs rudely nudged the sleeping professionals. The Netherlands’ four-wicket win yesterday at a gloomy Lord’s is anunlikely chirrup for Associate cricket.The Associates – known as “lesser nations”, “minnows” or simply “who?” – are often given an unfair rap, that the vast gap in quality simply doesn’t warrant their inclusion in tournaments. Or, worse, that their very existence is somehow fortuitous and sneaky; the charity cases of international cricket waiting for handouts. Sometimes these are faircriticisms: despite their lack of money, each country bickers and rumbles with controversies as frequently as England or India. But then days like yesterday happen, just as Ireland shocked Pakistan in the 2007 World Cup and, briefly, the light is shone on a level of cricket much under-rated.No one gave Netherlands a chance and, if they’re honest, they wouldn’t have expected to win yesterday’s match either. That they conquered a complacent England was not simply arrogance on the part of their hosts, but the benefits of relying on the basics. As Kenya’s coach, Andy Kirsten, told Cricinfo last year, all Associate cricketers can hit the ball just as sweetly as those from India, Australia, England or wherever else. Their technique might be agricultural and impure, or not sufficiently watertight to produce longer innings or memorable hundreds, but when chasing small totals none of that matters.As Netherlands showed today, the sheer basics of cricket, learned in parks or schools or in the back garden, remain the most fundamental aspect of a team’s success. Tom de Grooth, Darron Reekers and Ryan ten Doeschate – perhaps the best Associate batsman of them all – lack the purr of Ponting, the sheer power of Sehwag, but in Twenty20 cricket, it’s not how that matters. It’s how many, how quickly.As Associates, Netherlands (and Ireland and Scotland) have so little to lose. Twenty20s are done and dusted in just 240 balls, so they might as well dispense with pragmatic thinking and overly complicated preparation and simply thwack the ball when it’s there to be thwacked. The basics still apply, never more so than in this format. Some of deGrooth’s strokes were as brazen as the luminous orange kit he wore, but the most obviously evident tactics were of simple cricket: keen running, picking the gaps, turning ones into twos.”Today I was just in the zone, it worked for me,” said de Grooth. “I came in at No. 4 – I was supposed to come in at 7 – but after a few early wickets I came in at 4, and said to Bas [Zuiderent] after a few balls: ‘I’m just going to play my game and keep going’. It works. I think we went out there today to play brave cricket, and make England sweat. That was my natural game, how I like to play it.”We have seen so often with England in 50-over cricket their tendency to revert to the 1970s funereal method of scoring runs in the middle overs, nurdling it around asthmatically. And again today (though thanks to Netherlands’ tight bowling) they only managed a below-par 73 from the final ten overs. Not so much a case of seeing the ball,hitting the ball, as evidence of minds cluttered and confused with apparently inventive plans and tactics.

Some of de Grooth’s strokes were as brazen as the luminous orange kit he wore, but the most obviously evident tactics were of simple cricket: keen running, picking the gaps, turning ones into twos.

Twenty20 offers the big guns a chance to utterly demolish Associates. But in turn, the shortest format offers these so-called fledglings to hone in on the absolute basics, and give it a proper go. Such intrinsic simplicities are often disregarded when playing Associate nations, with the fair assumption that they will not sustain such basics overthe course of a match. Shorten the match to 20 overs, however, and the chances of an upset – especially against a one-day side so confusingly inconsistent as England – suddenly become deliciously possible.Ironically, it could be Associates’ background that spurs them to produce these occasional and thrilling upsets. Ireland managed it in the 2007 World Cup, beating Pakistan, and now Netherlands have stunned England. Both teams contain players who have full-time jobs away from the sport, and this is so often their handicap in developing fromamateurs into professionals. It pays to remember, too, that Netherlands and Co. simply don’t play Twenty20s regularly, and if they do, only against a really rusty club side or two, and often on matting wickets.”It costs a lot of money to qualify, because we have to take extra days off,” admitted Jeroen Smits, the captain, “but we really don’t mind. I’d love to take extra days off.”Amateur status is a constant blight on their development andNetherlands, in particular, remain angry at the ECB that they are notincluded in the Friends Provident Trophy along with (the England-feeder sides) Ireland andScotland. Ireland, in particular, are the Associate team to beatnowadays, and their exposure to county cricket cannot simply be acoincidence. “I don’t know [of] any cricket reasons not to be in thatcompetition,” Smits said. “This [win] speaks for itself.”For now, Netherlands are mere temporary visitors to England, but theyhave given their hosts the most enormous of wake-ups. Their victorytoday is a cautionary tale against complacency; that no matter who aside is up against, be they baggage handlers or bursars, even minnowsoccasionally like to win. Sometimes, they richly deserve it, too.

Clint Dempsey, Diego Luna, Jordi Alba headline 2025 MLS Skills Challenge, as six 2025 All-Star additions announced

Dempsey, the USMNT and MLS legend, joins several league stars in the showcase event, while additions made to All-Star roster

  • Dempsey joins Skills Challenge roster
  • USWNT star Lindsey Heaps also participating
  • Nashville's Mukhtar and Surridge among ASG additions

Get the MLS Season Pass today!Stream games now

  • Getty Images

    WHAT HAPPENED?

    U.S. legend Clint Dempsey was also known for his crafty technical ability during his playing days, which spanned between 2004-2018. He'll get a chance to show if he's still got it next Tuesday in MLS All-Star Skills Challenge in Austin, Texas.

    He will be joined by some of the best talent in MLS, Liga MX, Liga MX Femenil, and the USWNT in the competition, which is comprised of five head-to-head contests showcasing ball control, accuracy, strategy, and teamwork.

    Joining him is OL Lyonnais standout and U.S. women’s national team mainstay Lindsey Heaps, whose creative flair and World Cup-winning résumé make her a marquee addition to the lineup. Representing Mexico are Olympic gold medalist and longtime LIGA MX striker Oribe Peralta, along with Mexico women’s tational team defender Nicki Hernández, who currently plays for Club América.

    MLS standouts Diego Luna (Real Salt Lake), Denis Bouanga (LAFC), and Evander (FC Cincinnati) headline the 2025 All-Star Skills Challenge roster, which features players selected for their elite ability in shooting, touch, and passing. The group spans nine different clubs across the league.

    Four MLS participants – Evander, Luna, Bouanga, and Jordi Alba – return to the Skills Challenge stage, while six others are set to make their debuts: Sebastian Berhalter, Anders Dreyer, Alex Freeman, Sam Surridge, Brad Stuver, and Yohei Takaoka. MLS and LIGA MX will compete on behalf of 4ATX Foundation and MAS Cultura, resulting in $25,000 donations to their respective charities.

  • Advertisement

  • Getty Images Sport

    SIX MLS ALL-STAR ADDITIONS MADE

    In addition to announcing the Skills Challenge roster, MLS also made six additions to its roster of All-Stars, who are set to face the Liga MX All-Stars in its showpiece event on Wednesday. These moves are to account for player departures, such Patrick Agyemang's recent move from Charlotte FC to Derby, along with injuries.

    The additions for MLS All-Star manager Nico Estévez include Hany Mukhtar and Sam Surridge (Nashville SC), Carles Gil (New England Revolution), Marco Pašalić (Orlando City), Cristian Espinoza (San Jose Earthquakes), and Obed Vargas (Seattle Sounders).

    Gil earns his third All-Star nod – he has 15 goal contributions this season and ranks among the league’s all-time assist leaders. Mukhtar, a four-time All-Star, has 10 goals and eight assists in 2025 and leads MLS in total goal contributions since 2020. Surridge, amid a breakout campaign, has 16 goals in 22 matches.

    Espinoza returns for his second All-Star appearance, with 11 assists and four goals this season. Pašalić is a new addition to MLS and has made an immediate impact since joining Orlando, scoring 10 goals and adding four assists. Vargas, one of the league’s brightest young talents, has started every match for Seattle this year and debuted for Mexico’s senior national team in 2024.

  • Getty Images Sport

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    MLS is looking to improve its 1-2 record against Liga MX in the Skills Challenge while building on its 2-1 record in the All-Star Game against its rival league. Last season, the MLS All-Stars lost 4-1 loss to the Liga MX All-Stars in the main event.

    This year, with Liga MX bringing long-time soccer legends such as Sergio Ramos and James Rodriguez, the stakes are higher. MLS will be boosted, though, by the expected first appearance of Inter Miami's Lionel Messi in the competition.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • WHAT NEXT FOR MLS?

    The league kicks off the All-Star week with events this weekend in Austin. The MLS Next All-Star game is Monday, followed by Skills Challenge on Tuesday and then the All-Star Game on Wednesday.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus