'Getting a little frustrated just imagining owning an iPhone 7'

Life isn’t easy for cricketers. And they tell us all about it in our Twitter round-up

Alex Bowden16-Sep-2016First up, do you want to see Tino Best in his kitchen doing a conducting mime to Mozart with his shirt off?Of course you do.

Last time around we were all hanging on Kevin Pietersen’s every word as he painstakingly walked us through every last detail of his new wholesome lifestyle.Has it had any effect?

Proof, if it were needed, that barely eating results in weight loss among men who are actually surprisingly heavy.It is, of course, all part of his build-up to actually playing cricket again.

A whole 25. In an amateur game. In a match in which the fielders were apparently otherwise occupied taking photographs. Impressive stuff.It’s unclear whether the new health regime includes coffee, the great love of KP’s life. Perhaps he should share some of his quaffing expertise because others are failing to imbibe safely.

Pretty annoying. Just like this.

Decisions, decisions.

Manoj Tiwary decided to take a selfie. His destiny was to publish a photo of himself on Twitter.Seems he’s something of a connoisseur of the art.

This is a good effort too. Rob Key’s lost none of his old speed in retirement.

Speaking of golf.

You need to see more stuff.

You need to see more films.Maybe one day they’ll make a film about Graeme Swann’s life. Maybe they already have.

Somewhere in the world there is always a cricketer complaining about air travel.

Don’t sugar-coat it, Craig.KP has some concerns too.

That one’s probably fair enough. Maybe the guy who drives the motorised steps should be allowed and the guys who connect the fuel lines and all that – but yeah, in general you don’t want Joe Public roaming around out there. Fair point.Finally, an in-flight someone-elsie.

When Amol Muzumdar set a world record on debut

Mumbai’s Amol Muzumdar tells us about his first-class debut in Faridabad, when he channelled his inner fire and just kept on batting to set a record that still stands

Amol Muzumdar14-Oct-2016Haryana v Bombay, Faridabad, 1993-94I remember it precisely – February 12, 1994. It was the day I made my first-class debut, in the pre-quarterfinal of the Ranji Trophy. We were missing Sachin Tendulkar, Vinod Kambli, Sanjay Manjrekar and Salil Ankola at the time, as they had been called up for the New Zealand series.Prior to this game, every time they announced a team, I was included in the squad but not in the XI; instead, I was sent to play for the Under-19s. Although that made me unhappy, I never showed it. It was a good build-up – it kept a fire burning inside me.That year, we had won the U-19 tournament after a long gap. I had captained the side and got a hundred in each innings of the final. Just prior to my Ranji debut, we had also played the MA Chidambaram Trophy against a Rest of India U-19 team that had the likes of VVS Laxman and Hrishikesh Kanitkar. I had got a hundred in the second innings of that game, where we came close to chasing 426.I was picked to play for the India U-19s against a touring Australia U-19 side, so I had to make a decision whether I wanted to play in that match, or show up for the Ranji pre-quarterfinal. Luckily, Ravi Shastri, who was the Mumbai captain at the time, had given me a message seven days prior that I would be batting at No. 4 for Mumbai in that game. So the decision was a no-brainer – playing for Mumbai was my dream.Ravi Shastri was a towering figure, and the Mumbai dressing room could be daunting at times. As a youngster I might have felt a little nervous, but thankfully I was too preoccupied to be bothered by it. Besides, it was a breakthrough season for a lot of other guys in the Mumbai team. The team had gone through a transition and most of us – Sairaj Bahutule, Jatin Paranjpe and Paras Mhambrey, to name a few – were making our debuts in that season or had just broken into the squad in the previous season. We had all played together previously and this made things more comfortable.When Ravi handed me my Mumbai cap on that cold Faridabad morning, it was a special feeling. After putting in years of hard work, I felt like I had accomplished something.We won the toss and elected to bat. I had a routine: I would put my pads on and then wear my cap, with my gloves resting on my thighs. I also had a habit of walking around the dressing room and skipping for a bit. I watched the game but – I can say it easily 23 years later – I never liked to talk about cricket. I followed this routine that day, and was talking about other things with Paras – who was also my room-mate – while waiting to go in.Just after the drinks break, Sunil More got out and I walked out to the crease. I was nervous, but fully aware of what was happening around me. I defended the first two balls from the offspinner Pankaj Thakur, and stepped out to the third, driving it past cover for three runs. Jatin was at the other end, and he said later that he had crossed his legs – a superstition – when I was on strike. He was hoping everything went right for me on debut. It seemed to have worked, as I went on to score 260, which remains the world record for the highest first-class score on debut. You don’t just go and snatch world records unless you are Brian Lara. It just so happened that everything went right that day.When I was close to my hundred on the second day, Ravi was batting with me. He pepped me up a little bit when I got to 90, when I was, understandably, a little nervous. He said, “Just graft these 10 runs. Once you get them, I can guarantee the next 30 will flow like a river.”I have a habit of keeping snapshots in my mind. I can usually picture the exact place and moment that something happened. I recall taking a cab – a kilometre or two into town – to find an STD booth to call my dad. I was on top of the world when I told him about my hundred. I needed somebody to keep me grounded and my dad was the perfect person. He reminded me how I had got into the Mumbai team after a long wait.”Now that you are batting on hundred, don’t let go of it,” he said. “Even when the stars come back, make sure your place is there.”That kept ringing in my ears constantly and I just carried on. By tea, I was batting on 197 and a scorer reminded me about Gundappa Viswanath’s record of 230 on debut. There wasn’t much cricket in Faridabad at the time and people kept coming into the dressing room. So I asked Kaddu (Karsan Ghavri), my senior, if he could keep them away. I didn’t want to be rude, but I needed to be in my zone. I think Clive Lloyd had been at the game too. He had come to meet Ravi and seen my innings, but had left before I came in at tea.At the end of the second day, I was not out on 245. After play, I was sitting quietly in my chair and letting it all sink in. I remember Ravi coming in, putting his arm around my shoulders and saying, “How are you feeling now, young man?” Ravi was my hero and I was thrilled at that moment. It is another one of my precious snapshots.That night, BCCI president IS Bindra might have visited because his secretary was around and asked me if I knew I had made a world record. My reaction was: “Really? Can I tell my parents about it?”After the 260, the press was all over the shop. There were about three or four centuries scored in that innings and we had quite a tall score. Jatin and Ravi got hundreds as well. We only batted once and bowled them out twice to win by a huge margin.I used a SG Sunny Tonny bat that day. I only played four games with it and retired it after we won the Ranji Trophy that year. As a batsman, you tend to use your luckiest or most precious bats for a long time, but I said to myself, “This bat has given me recognition. It now goes in the vault.”

Jadeja stands out from the crowd

Many India fans have been tempted to ask, ‘What is so special about Ravindra Jadeja?’ In Mohali he gave a demonstration

Alagappan Muthu in Mohali28-Nov-20162:55

Ganguly: Jadeja should see himself as more than a No. 8

Ravindra Jadeja as relatable a cricketer as there has ever been. Skills wise.His left-arm spin has the mystery of a novel with the ending on the front cover, and his batting is hidden under a secret flap in the coaching manual so no professional will ever find it. Jadeja could have been you or me. It may well be this thought that spurs the critics. “What is so special about this fellow that he is playing for India?”Jadeja punched Chris Woakes, England’s fastest bowler, through cover for his first boundary in Mohali on Monday. Think about what happens when we play that shot against our buddies trundling in at 50kph.Still, the fact that he is paid to play the sport at the highest level demands a bit more scrutiny than those doing it to avoid homework. And for a man who has three first-class triple-centuries, the kind of shot-a-ball batting he has indulged in all his career has been jarring. In those moments, he was worse than you or me. We wouldn’t waste opportunities like that.In India’s first innings in Mohali, Jadeja faced the most balls he has ever done in a Test innings. He top-scored for India for the first time ever. He fell 10 short of a hundred his team-mates would have so cherished, coming down the track to try to smack a wide delivery from Adil Rashid over long-on, only to be caught on the boundary.”The shot that I got out to, that is my shot,” Jadeja said. “I always hit that ball for six, I have confidence in myself. But the ball came off the wicket slowly, so the impact wasn’t powerful. I am not disappointed that I got out to that shot.”Two months ago, Virat Kohli delayed his declaration in the second innings against New Zealand in Kanpur so Jadeja would get a fifty. India’s captain insisted his allrounder perform the Rajputana sword dance and only then walk off the field. On Monday, the celebration was prefaced with a look to the heavens and a clenching of his fist and it ended with the bat coming up towards his face in a . The first part of this routine was for himself. The flamboyance and gratitude was for his friends.This wasn’t like Lord’s in 2014 when Jadeja had come out with nothing to lose and everything to gain. Here, India had been coasting, then they lost three wickets for eight runs. Considering they had to bat last, they needed to score as many runs as they could now.That meant Jadeja had to behave like a proper batsman. He had to see off the good balls. He even had to tackle the second new ball. He was at the crease for 60 overs, weathering bouncers, standing up to reverse swing, putting on the Test’s biggest partnership with R Ashwin and giving India an invaluable lead. It was international cricket’s glimpse into the Jadeja that his domestic team Saurashtra have always known.The stance is simple. There is no premeditated movement. He allows himself a tucking of the right shoulder under his chin and then he is ready. In this innings, unlike previous times when he has looked appropriate to his position of No. 8, he played the ball late and trusted that if he lasted long enough he would get the runs his side needed.”I don’t look at myself as a batsman [at Test level],” Jadeja said. “But I am a batsman. I have made runs in domestic cricket, in first-class cricket. If you take away my Test performances, I average 53 in first-class cricket. It is not my first innings where I have made 90.”Agreed, this was my longest Test innings but I know that I can play. It is just that I was trying to give myself time, was not in a rush. I realised it was coming slowly off the pitch, there wasn’t much turn. So if I settled down, I knew that after 60-70 balls, I could up my scoring rate.”Having realised that, England went to Plan B and tried drying up the runs with a 7-2 off-side field. There was a gully, two short covers and a mid-off in a straight line pointing to the sightscreen behind Jadeja. All of them turned in unison to watch a spanking on-drive for four. He found a tiny gap off a cut shot, between gully and point; then produced an encore of the on-drive and finally wrapped the over up with a down-the-track whack through vacant midwicket. The ICC Code of Conduct doesn’t allow a batsman to walk up and laugh in the opposition’s face. Trust Jadeja to find the loophole.”They were bowling very boring lines, outside off, outside off, outside off,” he said. “There was a lot of time, no shortage of time. But I thought I could disturb the bowler, get outside off and hit through the leg side where there were just two fielders. Luckily in that over, I got four boundaries.”It was a little bit of fun after ages and ages of restraint, indulged only after India had pulled ahead of England by 80 runs. That is how he thinks: team first. He can bowl endlessly if asked. He fields like few Indians ever have. He’s learning to bat better. Wonder what would happen if he is tasked to make sure Mohali has a full house for Test matches.Jadeja could have been you or me. His idea of a romantic date is a candlelit dinner in Paris. We’ve had those same fantasies. He has a lot of experience with colourful advice coming to him from all sides when he bowls. Same as us in gully cricket. We can bowl a good-length ball too. Just that he can bowl it for overs at a time. We can dance down and hit over the top too. He does it knowing the vilification that awaits a mistake. We can be Jadeja, if only we can put in the years and years of hard work he has.

Dissecting the Daredevils batting order

Aakash Chopra analyses the Delhi Daredevils batting order, and offers insight into some of the more curious events during their game against Kolkata Knight Riders

Aakash Chopra17-Apr-20172:05

Hogg: Delhi lost it with their batting

Why is Sanju Samson opening?
Sanju Samson batted at No. 3 in Pune and got a century. Since then, he’s opened and looked brilliant. Form is gold in T20, and therefore, there is merit in promoting Samson to the top. Daredevils, in the past, have been guilty of not acknowledging the importance of form. They have been happy to select the team and decide the batting order. That’s why the move to open with Samson must be lauded.This year, the standout feature of Samson’s batting has been his timing. He’s one of the few batsmen with almost no trigger movement; that’s why he’s rarely off-balance. But, it must also be noticed that while Samson starts with a bang, he slows down radically soon after. In Pune, the first 19 balls produced 35 runs, and the following 19 fetched him only 13. Against Kolkata Knight Riders, he scored 27 runs off his first 12 balls, but slowed down after the introduction of spin, managing only 12 off the next 13 balls.Why isn’t Rishabh Pant batting higher?
Even before Samson hit his straps, Rishabh Pant had made his presence felt. He is one of the brightest talents in Indian cricket, having shown both the range of strokes and the ability to stay unfazed under pressure. While Samson merited a promotion, Pant is demanding to get a bigger share of the 120 balls. He has batted at Nos. 5, 4, 5 and 5. It’s frustrating to observe that his ability to hit big shots is working against him.Pant versus Narine
As Sunil Narine bowled his first ball to Pant, the field placement had Gambhir written all over it. He had a slip and a silly point in place. Gambhir is one of the few captains in the IPL who genuinely believes that taking wickets is the best way to stop runs, and that everyone is equally vulnerable at the start of an innings. While this tactic was worth applauding, it was equally heartening to see Pant’s response to the first two deliveries from Narine. Most young batsmen, especially when playing Narine for the first time, plant their front foot down the pitch. But Pant nonchalantly went on the back foot and played him through the leg side, as if he had grown up playing cricket with Narine and had read his variation from the hand.Rishabh Pant is in terrific form, but doesn’t bat up the order•AFPWhy is Mathews batting ahead of Morris?
Daredevils’ batting order has raised a few eyebrows. It’s quite apparent that they are desperately trying to bring Karun Nair into form. While there’s some rationale in keeping faith in Nair, it was surprising to see Angelo Mathews walking ahead of Chris Morris. If it wasn’t for Pant’s 38 off 16 balls, Daredevils wouldn’t have managed even 150.Were Morris and Cummins held back too late?At one stage Knight Riders were 21 for 3, and that’s when you expect the bowling unit to exert more pressure and look for wickets. While Zaheer Khan did hunt for a wicket for a while, he went on the defensive in the middle overs. He seemed concerned about getting through Mohammaed Shami’s overs and, with both Manish Pandey and Yusuf Pathan set, Amit Mishra’s overs as well. The fielders he had in the circle were on the edge and weren’t trying to stop singles, which allowed the partnership to grow.The 13th and 14th overs were bowled by Mathews and Zaheer, though Morris and Cummins had three and two left respectively. One could understand Zaheer wanting to save Morris for overs 15, 17 and 19, and Cummins for the 16th and 18th. But Pandey and Yusuf were aware of that too. They scored 26 in those two overs, bridging the gap between runs required and balls remaining.

Afridi's star quality can't hide McManus promise

ESPNcricinfo rounds up the highlights from the latest matches in the NatWest T20 Blast

David Hopps08-Jul-2017Shahid Afridi’s star quality can still flare, even at 37. His four wickets were at the heart of Hampshire’s triumph in Cardiff and there was more delight for the south coast side when Reece Topley (remember him?) again revived hopes that his perpetual injuries would relent with three victims of his own.Less eye-catching, yet just as important, was the innings produced by Lewis McManus. Hampshire wicketkeepers have rarely stood out with the bat in Twenty20, but his 59 was the second highest innings for a county by a stumper.Justification then for his selection ahead of Tom Alsop, the England Lions batsman, and indeed for Hampshire’s relaxed attitude towards Adam Wheater’s departure for Essex over the winter.

****

Alex Lees misses out on Yorkshire’s delightYorkshire had much to celebrate after their defeat of Nottinghamshire, the Royal London Cup winners and strongly fancied for further success in the NatWest Blast. Their crowd of 10,200 was the biggest at Headingley for a T20 match outside the Roses match, and their 227 for 5 was their highest ever T20 score.One man not soaking up the delight, though, was Alex Lees, their T20 captain last season, who was not even at the ground after being left out of the squad for the first two matches. Quite a come down for the player who when he was appointed became Yorkshire’s youngest official captain since the father of Yorkshire cricket, Lord Hawke.Lees was touted as an England Test contender not so long ago but his career has entered the backwaters, with a string of careless dismissals in the Championship and, according to some regular observers, the air of a man not loving the game. In his ghosted column in the Bradford he referenced other interests and making the most of his short time away from the game.Lord Hawke, who tended to be unsympathetic about such things, would tell him to pull himself together and think of England.

****

Tom Curran is not the sort to be deflated for long•Getty ImagesTom Curran bounces backThe Royal London Cup final was an unsatisfying experience for Surrey’s Curran brothers with neither making much of an impression as Nottinghamshire, led by a brilliant innings by Alex Hales (who was in mint form again at Headingley on Friday night).It is unlikely that Tom or Sam will be suppressed for long – and Tom, who has won England T20 honours this summer, held his nerve in the final over at Chelmsford as Surrey squeezed a two-run victory against Essex. With Essex needing 10 off the final over, he dismissed both Ravi Bopara and Ashar Zaidi.The number of delighted tweets from Surrey players celebrating the way they had silenced Fortress Chelmsford suggested they might have been getting a bit of abuse along the way.

****

John Wright keeps it simple as the Big Fellas toppleThe most striking result of the night came at Wantage Road, home of the defending champions Northants, where the Big Fellas suffered an opening-night stumble against Derbyshire.This might have been wholly unexpected where it not for Derbyshire’s shrewd recruitment of John Wright as a specialist T20 coach. Such a policy is possible this season because the NatWest Blast is being played in a block and Derbyshire and Middlesex, who have brought another Kiwi in Dan Vettori, have been the first counties to take advantage.Wright comes with a wealth of IPL experience – he coached Mumbai Indians to the title – and, if he makes the same impression at Derbyshire as a coach that he did as a player, the signing will be quite a coup. Affable off the field and a craggy competitor on it, he made 27 first-class hundreds for Derbyshire, the most by any overseas player to represent the county.Derbyshire might be one of the most unfancied sides in the competition, but they made it back-to-back wins by beating Yorkshire in front of a sellout Chesterfield crowd on Saturday – with Wright’s tactical influence apparent in the promotion of New Zealand seamer Matt Henry for a bit of derring-do at No. 4.Not that Wright is about to impart all his vast knowledge at once, if his analysis to the is anything to go by. “I’ve looked at the figures and I see we concede a lot of runs per over and we don’t score that many runs per over,” he said. Nothing like starting from the basics.

****

Ryan Higgins designs the recovery of the nightRecovery of the night came at Cheltenham where Middlesex were looking down the barrel, with eight down and 64 needed off the last 26 deliveries.
Zimbabwean-born Ryan Higgins then took a hand with four fours and six sixes to take Middlesex level with a ball remaining before Benny Howell added a final twist by salvaging a tie with a last-ball dismissal.Young fans hunt autographs in Cardiff•Getty Images

Surprise decider highlights England's arrested development

England face an obviously encouraged West Indies side and the realisation that they will go to Australia unsure of several positions in their first-choice XI

George Dobell at Lord's06-Sep-2017In an ideal world England would have a settled team by now.And, in an ideal world (for them, at least), they would have wrapped up this series and gone into the final Test resting key players and mumbling platitudes about the decline of Caribbean cricket.But it’s not that way at all. Instead they face an obviously encouraged West Indies side and the realisation that they will go to Australia unsure of several positions within their top five, needing to improve their bowling and a little short of the firepower required on flat pitches when the ball will not swing.For all the entertaining cricket they have played, and for all the credit they deserve for winning the South Africa series, it is not at all obvious that England have made much progress as a Test side this English summer. Yes, James Anderson has proved he is still a force. And yes, Toby Roland-Jones has added to the seam-bowling stocks. But we knew Joe Root and Alastair Cook and Ben Stokes were fine players. What England really needed to see was for three or four other players to prove their worth alongside the settled seven or eight.And now they go into a final Test on a surface that may well help seamers – and therefore one on which a session or two could define the result – with the burden of expectation weighing heavily upon them. Win and it is nothing more than what was anticipated. But lose? It is not the sort of history this team wants to be making.It’s odd that England are such heavy favourites, really. While West Indies’ away record is modest – and the word ‘away’ could easily have been omitted from that sentence – they have beaten England in two of the three most recent Tests the sides have contested. And, for all West Indies’ frailties, England are consistently inconsistent. Since Trevor Bayliss took over as coach before the Ashes in July 2015 they have lost as many matches (14) as they have won.They also remain over-reliant on a few key players. With the bat, in particular, they have leaned heavily upon Root’s consistency. His record of reaching fifty in 12 consecutive Tests is exceptional (nobody has done it more often in succession), but it has also masked holes. If West Indies get him early – and he was dropped on 8 in the first innings in Leeds – they may expose that dangerous middle-order against a newer ball and fresher bowlers. Root, as ever, holds the key.In some way, it is remarkable what success England have enjoyed in recent times. To win Ashes series, to beat South Africa home and away, to go within a victory of reaching the No. 1 Test ranking is extraordinary for a team still seeking a regular opening partner, a settled No. 3 and another batsman in the top five. It points not only to the excellence of several other players, but the potential they retain if they can fill the remaining holes.Root remains reluctant to return to the No. 3 spot. While it’s easy to make a strong argument for him to move back to the position, his rebuttal – “No.4 is where I feel most comfortable” – is even more persuasive. Such is his importance to the side, it makes sense for him to bat where he is most comfortable. To move him, while tempting, might also be considered weakening a strength.Mark Stoneman may well have done enough to earn the Ashes tour already. One Test half-century isn’t enough to suggest the search for an opener is over but there is something in his equanimity that bodes well. And it’s not as if he has a host of rivals clamouring for the place.The same cannot quite be said for Tom Westley or Dawid Malan. While Westley started nicely, showing time to play the ball and some lovely timing, he has started to look a little more rattled as the scrutiny and pressure have grown. Whether it’s fair or not, he is probably playing for his future at Lord’s.Malan has had almost the opposite experience. After a brutal start, he has ground out two half-centuries. It has not been pretty and it has not been entirely convincing. But ultimately runs are the currency that counts and, back on his home ground, he has another chance to establish himself. A failure, however, could see the likes of Alex Hales or Gary Ballance displace him in the Ashes squad.Joe Root, Trevor Bayliss and Paul Farbrace watch on during England nets•Getty ImagesWith so much hanging on this game personally, it seems unlikely the likes of Malan and Westley will be able to heed Root’s words to see the game “as an opportunity to do something very special”.There is some logic in the decision to play Roland-Jones. Quite apart from being a good all-round cricketer, as a Middlesex player he knows this Lord’s surface well and should have few issues adapting to the slope. It might be remembered, though, that Chris Woakes took an 11-wicket haul the last time he played a Test here.It seems there was little thought given to dropping one of the batsmen and playing both seamers. Or including the legspinner Mason Crane.”You don’t want too many options,” Root said. “And you want to make sure the guys go out there and get rhythm. You look at the conditions and it looks as if seamers will be more productive on this wicket.”But with Woakes a more-than-proficient batsman and several of the bowlers carrying a few miles in their legs, the option of another seamer might be worth revisiting. Especially in Australia where flat pitches and warm weather could test Jimmy Anderson’s shoulder, Ben Stokes’ knee and Stuart Broad’s feet to the limit.Either way, it suggests the decision to recall Woakes (and drop Roland-Jones) for Leeds was premature. He had not had sufficient bowling – just 20 first-class overs – since returning from a serious injury at the start of June and had only played one first-class game since returning from India at the end of 2016. It was asking too much of him to expect a return to the level of consistency he demonstrated last year. He would have been better served playing a couple more Championship matches.The same might be said for Crane. Settling into the England set-up – and benefiting from their coaching – in no doubt beneficial. But he is 20 years old and has played only five Championship matches (and taken 16 wickets at a cost of 40 apiece) this season. If he is to be ready for an Ashes tour, the decision to omit him from the limited-overs squads is therefore sensible.The optimistic way to look upon this series decider is to conclude that the added pressure will be a welcome gauge of how some of these players can adapt to the demands that may await in Australia. And that, for Test cricket as a whole and West Indies in particular, such a decider can only be positive.But that it has come to this for England is a reminder of how reliant they are upon Root and how many holes his excellence has masked. If West Indies can account for him early at Lord’s, they will have a great opportunity to create history.

Immy's crowd

Sanjay Manjrekar looks back at his encounters with Imran Khan and the side he led, and the Sharjah matches of the ’90s

Sanjay Manjrekar08-Jan-2018My first day of international cricket in Pakistan is one I will never forget. It was the afternoon session in Karachi, Pakistan were batting and I was fielding at mid-on. Suddenly from behind me I heard someone muttering something about ‘Kashmir’ and ‘you Indians’. I looked back to see a person in a grey Pathani suit walk past me and head towards the pitch. He had just nonchalantly walked in with a Test match going on. When he reached the pitch, he started shouting anti-India slogans – basically, telling us we shouldn’t have come on tour. As the fielding team, we didn’t know what to do, so most of us just stayed in our places hoping that the people who were supposed to take care of such matters would do their job.The umpires tried to intervene, but the man went straight for the then Indian captain, Kris Srikkanth. The next thing we saw, to our utter shock and disbelief, was Srikkanth and the man exchanging blows. I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. Srikkanth was now holding him by his shirt, and there was pulling and tugging from both sides. It was a streetfight, except that it was happening during a Test match, and one of the persons involved was the India Test captain.Within seconds, a few other players joined the fight. The man was surrounded by the Indian players. I don’t clearly recall who all were there but Kiran More, always the team man, definitely got involved. I found it a little funny, watching More, with his pads on, trying to kick the intruder through all the legs and bodies that had surrounded him. It was also slightly amusing that the only fallout of this was Srikkanth going off the field for a couple of overs to change his shirt after he had lost all the buttons in the scuffle. The Test match continued as if nothing had happened. If this had happened today, the series would have been called off.We now know that such an incident is no laughing matter, but this was 1989 and those were different days. Pakistan was a different country. They were also a different cricket team, unlike any other team the world had seen. We got a sample of that even before the first Test started.Both the teams were practising in the evening session when we suddenly saw the legendary leg-spinner Abdul Qadir sprinting after a man. At first we wondered if that man was with the team, but he was a random spectator, one of the hundreds who had assembled at the National Stadium to watch us train. They had wandered onto the field as our practice went on. And there was Qadir, running after him as if his life depended on it. The rest of the crowd started to watch it and enjoy it. This man was younger and fitter than Qadir, and just as Qadir would get close to him, he would suddenly change direction. The chase went on for about five minutes. Both the teams stopped doing whatever they were doing, and began to watch this spectacle: a great leg-spinner running after a fan during a practice session before a Test match.Eventually the chase came to an end when the security joined in. Maybe Qadir was allowed to have a couple of swipes at the man before they let him go. The show was over, and we went back to our practice sessions. There was nothing in the papers the next morning either. We were later told by a Pakistan player – in a hush-hush manner – that the man had pinched Qadir’s bottom during the practice session.Pakistanis were known to be emotional cricketers. At times, they resembled a dysfunctional family, constantly quarrelling but coming together when it mattered. Undoubtedly, they had exceptional talent, but they needed a patriarch to bring them all together. That patriarch was my biggest take-away from that tour. When I came back from that tour, I was dying to tell my friends about the man who had now matched, perhaps surpassed, Sunil Gavaskar as my cricket idol.The author on his way to a half-century at the Old Trafford Test in 1990•Getty ImagesI could find no fault with Imran Khan Niazi. He had me even before hello. Those were the days when the Pakistan team was notorious for fielding thirteen men against the opposition – Shakoor Rana and Khizer Hayat or any of their two local umpires providing them great support. Call them patriotic if you wish, all their success at home had an asterisk attached to it. But Imran said, ‘No more.’ And in that big series against arch rivals India, he single-handedly ensured we had neutral umpires, John Hampshire and John Holder, both from England.It became clear that Imran had the will – and the necessary influence – to make such far-reaching changes to improve the perception of his team. He wanted the world to see his team beat India without help from the umpires. He was willing to risk losing in this endeavour, but as we found out over the next four Tests, it was not easy to beat a side led by such a fierce competitor.Imran was thirty-seven years old at the time. He had lost all his pace by then, but we never felt we could target him in the field or when he was bowling or when he batted. It was absolutely incredible watching him throughout that series. I don’t recall a single moment on the field on that trip when Imran’s attention drifted away from what was happening in the centre. We could be piling on the runs, it could be a long hot day in the field, but there was not one moment where you could see him looking in the direction of the stands or seeming bored. His eyes were always focused on what was happening on the field.Things obviously didn’t go as per plan for Pakistan as we managed to draw all the four Tests of that series. Barring the last Test in Sialkot, we got flat pitches everywhere. They started off being green but went back to their natural state as the match went on. There were a lot of overs to be bowled on long, hard days. Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis were the new pace sensations, but Imran knew they needed to be used sparingly as strike weapons; they had to be preserved as out-and-out quicks should be. Waqar had some fitness issues, so he played only two Tests. Imran, though, kept running in ball after ball on those flat pitches with the old ball, and sent down 185.3 overs in that series. On either side, only Wasim bowled more than Imran.It was not just the number of overs he bowled, it was his intensity that stood out. Imran was a metronome as a bowler. Primarily, he was a major in-swing bowler so his aim used to be to start wide outside off and end up on the off stump. He did that for almost every ball for the 25-30 overs he bowled every day. On the odd occasion that the ball finished on the middle stump and I was able to flick it for runs on the leg side, he would get absolutely livid with himself. I would then get to hear him utter the choicest of abuses in Punjabi and English. Even if it was just one run to square leg, the fact that he had allowed the batsman to play on the leg side was a big failure in his opinion. He was merciless on himself, and he expected the same from others.In Lahore, when I was taking a single to bring up my double-century, I could hear Imran berating the bowler for allowing me to get an easy one on the leg side. I don’t remember whether he applauded when I reached the landmark. Later in the series when Shoaib Mohammad was about to reach his landmark we had Srikkanth and More bowling.I remember there was a match where we got confused if it was a one-day international or an exhibition game. With no agreement forthcoming, one team started out playing thinking it was a serious match, and the other team played it like an exhibition match. With Imran in one of the teams, you didn’t need to guess which side took the game seriously. So we had Srikkanth clowning around with the ball, doing impressions of Qadir’s action, and Imran watching it all with a deadpan expression. After bowling a long hop at Imran, Srikkanth smiled, but Imran just stared back with a straight face.Wasim Akram: a bowling genius shaped by Imran•Getty ImagesIn the Faisalabad Test, Sachin Tendulkar got a light feather of a touch on the ball as he looked to work it off his hip. It was such a faint edge that no one appealed. Except Imran Khan, who was at mid-on. The umpire shook his head, but Imran was convinced there was some bat in that one. He kept asking his players how come they didn’t hear it. ‘ [there was definitely a sound],’ he kept saying before he reluctantly dragged his feet back to mid-on.At the end of the over, Tendulkar and I got together and he said, ‘What a guy. What sharp ears.’ He knew he had edged it. The wicketkeeper didn’t hear it, the umpire didn’t hear it, but the man at mid-on did. No one was as focused on the game as Imran was.The cricket field was a place where Imran would let himself go. Captaining a team known for rustic behaviour, he would become the biggest rascal of them all. His cursing was a big part of his cricket. We knew he studied at Oxford and spoke charmingly, but it was a sight to behold when he let it rip at himself or his team-mates in the language of the common Pakistani man. Wasim and Waqar imitate Imran brilliantly. Whenever Wasim does it, a generous dose of swear words is a big part of the script. Imran truly felt at home on a cricket field, and expressed himself without a filter.That he could connect with everyone in his team was a reason why he led Pakistan so successfully. They were a difficult side to lead. A side whose superstar batsman Javed Miandad enjoyed so much influence that he could ask for and get a flat pitch in Lahore for his hundredth Test despite his captain’s wish to play on surfaces that help his young sensational quicks.Because of the flat pitches, a typical Test for Imran would mean bowling 35-40 overs in an innings as we scored 400 or upwards. In the ten-minute break between innings, Imran – a lower-middle- order batsman – would come out all padded up to have a knock. He would repeat it in every break – lunch, tea – while his team batted. He would always have his full gear on as he came out for the knock.On occasion if my eye wandered towards the dressing rooms when Pakistan were batting, I could see Imran fooling around with either the bat or the ball as he sat in the balcony. We had one such player in our dressing room too, but he was sixteen years old and on his first international tour. Imran, meanwhile was thirty-seven, and had been an international cricketer for eighteen years by then.Imran’s methods as captain made so much sense. It may have looked crude at times but it was effective especially given Pakistan’s temperament. He could sense when a batsman was losing concentration; he would send out messages through substitutes. He could see an event before it happened and avert disasters.There was no one in the Indian team to do such things. To be fair, Sandeep Patil did that to us, but only at the Ranji level. As a commentator, I once suggested M.S. Dhoni to become more hands on, to get into the head of someone like Umesh Yadav, to use a combination of Yadav’s skill and fitness and Dhoni’s brain. For this is what I had seen Imran do from mid-on with Wasim and Waqar.The sweet smell of Sharjah success: Saleem Malik, Imran Khan, Wasim Akram and Javed Miandad celebrate with the Austral-Asia Cup trophy in 1990•Ben Radford/Getty ImagesThere are great stories of how Imran used to mentor the young fast bowlers. *Once, Waqar was driven past mid-on by a batsman, past Imran. Imran didn’t exactly fancy chasing the ball, which pulled up inches outside the boundary. Imran came all the way back with the ball in his hand and asked Waqar, ‘Vicky, what did you do there?’Waqar replied, ‘Skipper, I tried to bowl an inswinger to him.’ Imran threw up his arms in the air, and cried out to Waqar, ‘, ask me before you do any such thing.’A young bowler once stood at the top of his run and didn’t run in right away. After a few seconds passed, Imran shouted at him from mid-on, ‘Why aren’t you bowling?’ The reply was: ‘You didn’t tell me what to bowl.’Both Tendulkar and I were so inspired by Imran’s and then the South African way of bowling – machine-like outside the off stump and waiting for the batsmen to make mistakes – that we copied those styles when we played for Mumbai. We had an incredible time doing that. We destroyed all our opposition this way. All Mumbai bowlers bowled every ball as per our directives. They were the better for it. It was only when Ajit Agarkar came along in my last year as Mumbai captain that I felt I didn’t need to tell him anything.As with the great West Indies players, Imran wanted to play the game the right way. In 1992, we played Pakistan in a series of three matches in England to raise funds for Imran’s hospital. The first was played at Crystal Palace in London. Even though they were exhibition matches, the fervour among fans did not diminish. If anything, they got a freer hand than at international matches. There were pitch invasions and missiles. The 42-over contest was reduced to 40, and eventually 25. Pakistan needed 69 runs in 7.5 overs when their fans made another invasion, forcing the organizers to abandon the game. At the post-match presentations, Imran grabbed the microphone and announced that India had won this game and said the Pakistan fans’ behaviour was shameful.In my first personal encounter with Imran, I was afraid I had infuriated my hero similarly. This was from a Sharjah tour before we went to Pakistan in 1989. We were at the ground for an India-Pakistan match. I was taking a knock before the match when I hit a ball that went in the direction of some Pakistani journalists standing just outside the boundary. It nearly cleaned out one of them as they all ducked for cover. One of them shouted at me, ‘Play these shots in the match, not here.’I was a young hothead then, and saw this remark as one coming from someone who was part of the dominant camp in Sharjah. Pakistan were a superb side respected all over the world, and when it came to Sharjah they were the kings. Teams just turned up in Sharjah to take their beating from Pakistan. The Indian team went there twice a year, so I guess we bore the brunt more than the others. That’s why I thought that the offended journalist was being arrogant.That made me angry, and I told him he should be in the press box and not in the ground. The journalist was in no mood to step back, and we had a spat. Raman Lamba had to intervene and drag me away. The matter didn’t end there, though. At the Sharjah Cricket Stadium you have to walk through a common lounge area to get to your respective dressing rooms. As I walked back through there, one of my team-mates asked me what had happened, and I said, ‘Nothing, just some Pakistani rascal trying to act smart.’Then I felt a tap on my shoulder, and that unmistakable loud booming voice told me, ‘Don’t be so anti-Pakistani.’Months later, when I was in awe of Imran during that Pakistan tour, I was always reminded of how I had begun on the wrong foot with my hero. I wondered if Imran held that against me still. I wondered if that was the reason he swore at his bowler for letting me take the 200th run easily in Lahore. I wondered if I could ever be on friendly terms with Imran.The 1989 tour came and went. Imran didn’t speak a word to me on the field through the four Tests. Once the series was over, though, Imran was lavish in his praise for me on every public platform. I realized now that to Imran the Sharjah incident might have been so trivial he possibly didn’t even remember it. As with all great ambassadors of the game, it was good cricket that mattered to him. To get such admiration from my idol was the biggest prize for my performance in Pakistan.Our next interaction came after I had a lukewarm tour of New Zealand. The moment he saw me he asked me, ‘Why did you play Richard Hadlee off the back foot?’ He told me I played Wasim and Waqar well because I was looking to move forward all the time. While it was sound technical advice, I was just floored that my hero liked my batting enough to follow that tour and be disappointed with my failures. This was a Pakistani following the progress of an Indian and wanting him to do well.I was not the only one. This was the time Maninder Singh had developed the yips and had lost his run-up, his action, his zip. A prodigious talent with a beautiful action, Maninder was a shadow of himself now. After speaking to me, Imran headed straight to Maninder and asked him, ‘Manni, what have you done to your bowling? Why did you change your action? There is no run-up now, nothing.’Maninder tried to reason with him by saying he had lost his accuracy and had to shorten his run-up to regain the control, but Imran was having none of it. ‘If I lose my accuracy I can’t shorten my run-up,’ Imran said. ‘I will lose all my pace. This is not done. Go back to the original run-up and keep bowling at one stump, a thousand balls a day, and you will find your accuracy.’Imran was not born to be a great. He had to work hard and put himself through tremendous grind to achieve greatness. Plus, he was a generous man to boot. These are the people who have a lot of cricket wisdom to share and pass on rather than the ridiculously talented cricketers.Waqar Younis bowls in the Wills Trophy in Sharjah in October 1991, a tournament that, like many others at the venue, Pakistan won•Getty ImagesRamiz Raja once told me that if Imran had been my captain he would have never dropped me and would have ensured that I succeeded at all cost. He was that kind of a leader. If he believed in someone, he backed that player fully. Inzamam-ul-Haq was a beneficiary of Imran’s trust. Even before Imran took him to the World Cup in Australia and New Zealand, Imran had announced to the world that they had found the next great batsman. When Inzamam failed at No. 3 in the 1992 World Cup, the thirty-nine-year-old Imran pushed himself up to No. 3 but never dropped Inzamam, who eventually won them the semi-final against New Zealand.Imran and the other seniors around him had incredible self-belief. They thought their team was second to none, no matter where they played or against whom they played. There weren’t too many around in India to do what Imran did for Inzamam.Imran also knew his players inside out. Ramiz told me how he would settle differences within the team. There was this one time when Saleem Yousuf and Javed Miandad got into a bit of a fight on the field. They were both strong characters, and neither man was willing to take a step back. During the lunch break, an upset Miandad went up to Imran and said that either Yousuf was going to stay on the tour or he was; that the team was too small for both Yousuf and him.Imran listened to him and said, ‘, Javed [Javed, you are impossible]’ Imran then laughed and left. That was it. That was the end of the fight. It was incredible. With any other captain, who knows how much this issue would have escalated. Imran, though, knew Javed well enough to handle him the way he did, and he also had the stature and the intelligence to trivialize this threat.Ramiz has often told me he never ever heard one negative thought expressed in the Pakistan dressing room during Imran’s tenure as captain. He still wonders where Imran got the confidence from to say they were going to win the World Cup the moment they landed in Australia in 1992. Even when Pakistan played West Indies, they would go in with positivity. Not one defensive word was said. He spread this positivity all around.It will forever be my regret that we had no Imran-like senior in our dressing room. Youngsters like Kiran More and Manoj Prabhakar would have gained a lot under Imran; they were the kind of players Imran backed. Ijaz Ahmed once batted conservatively at the end of an ODI innings, and came back with a score of 30-odd not out. Imran told him he would be sent back home if he put his personal interests ahead of the team ever again. In India, meanwhile, More found himself batting higher in the order against formidable attacks because more accomplished senior players chose to take the easy way out by dropping themselves down the order.Similarly, Prabhakar ended up opening with the bat in 23 of his 39 Tests. These two were also a little Pakistani when it came to temperament. Contrary to the narrative of a bitter rivalry between the India and Pakistan teams, we got along pretty well. The rivalry was more among the fans, who were in each other’s faces, and the media. In Pakistan in 1989 for over two months, there was not a single instance of any fight or a face-off between the players – except that Prabhakar and More always tried getting under the skin of Miandad, who was not one to take it lying down. The unforgettable More-Miandad incident that we saw in the 1992 World Cup was at least three years in the making.

****

It’s not as if Pakistan were the most cohesive unit of all time, but at least it was more fun than malice. Their turning on each other in full public view – and they did so endearingly – made them a fun side to watch. It was loud when you went out to bat against Pakistan, but the noise would be their elders sledging each other. They would quarrel with each other on the field. They were constantly at each other when Imran wasn’t near.There were no glares or shrugs of shoulders at misfields, only the choicest abuse, especially from Imran. I would be memorizing the great one-liners to repeat them to my friends once I got back – I’d imagine how thrilled they would be when I told them of how Imran behaved on the field.Miandad would constantly be in Imran’s ear with this advice or the other. Imran would at best tolerate him. I never saw Imran listen to advice from Miandad – a great in his own right – seriously. I never saw Miandad let up either. Then when it would get too much, you would hear Imran’s booming voice: ‘ Javed [You let it be, Javed. You give one advice one moment, and something completely different the next moment].’ Miandad would go back to the slip cordon muttering under his breath that things would be better if done his way.Somebody once asked Imran if Miandad’s advice ever worked for him and Pakistan at an important stage in any match. Imran’s reply was that if somebody gave you a thousand suggestions a day, one or two were bound to work.At times, it would get comical, but Pakistan knew how to win matches. That’s where India and Pakistan were different at that time. We just carried with us a lot of self-doubt and negativity when we left our shores. While we would easily lose to England in England, Pakistan would go there and hammer them. In 1992, two years after our tour of England, Pakistan came and not only thrashed England but also beat all counties outright in the side games only because there was a financial jackpot to be won if any team did that.Even when we went to Sharjah, known for its flat pitches, it seemed we were there just to accept our punishment. Indeed, Sharjah was where the India-Pakistan rivalry would grow in intensity, perhaps thanks to the Pakistani fans in Sharjah. From the moment we landed at the airport, they would be in our faces. At the hotel, at the restaurants, at the shopping centres, and in the ground where the stands were so close to the playing area it seemed they could stretch their arms and touch us. Chants of ‘, Pakistan [Long live Pakistan]’ haunted us everywhere.Other than that, especially now that I look back, playing Pakistan was not as tough as people think. All the drama and the tension, the history between the two nations, the emotion that came with the matches, were external. As players, we weren’t nearly as intense or edgy about facing off against each other as the fans were. In fact, we played against each other so many times that it eased our equation a bit.Playing Pakistan was a far easier challenge than playing England, South Africa or Australia in their backyards. For starters, you played them mostly in Asia, many times in Sharjah – the flattest pitches you could get. I don’t rate batting performances in Sharjah very highly. I once got the Man of the Series award there. It’s not something I wear as a badge of honour.HarperCollinsThere used to be a graveyard near the Sharjah Stadium. Every time we travelled to the ground, I used to wonder if the signage pointing towards the graveyard should actually point towards the ground; it was after all a graveyard for bowlers. ‘Sharjah Stadium, where great bowlers’ spirits come to die.’ I once lofted Curtly Ambrose straight over his head in Sharjah. His next ball to me was a slower ball on my pads. It was like a tiger had been reduced to eating grass. That’s what Sharjah did to bowlers, barring, of course, the Pakistani bowlers.Off the field, though, there used to be a lot of glamour in Sharjah. Film stars, pop stars and other famous and infamous faces would often be seen in the luxurious boxes. We were – at least I was – blissfully unaware of what might have gone on under the surface. All I knew back then was that India versus Pakistan was a big draw, which is why we were invited to Sharjah and to other exhibition matches over and over again.The exhibition matches were played in a light-hearted vein but would witness spurts of intense competition, often on an individual level. Take the instance of Javed Miandad and Dilip Vengsarkar – both quite similar as people, which is why they were friendly off the field. However, in one such exhibition match on the 1989 tour, Waqar bowled a lovely outswinging yorker that pitched on the base of Vengsarkar’s off stump and sent it cartwheeling. I was at the non-striker’s end, and I saw Vengsarkar was a little shaken up by the rookie’s excellent bowling.I got out shortly after, and I was having tea with Vengsarkar when Miandad walked straight towards him. And without any pleasantries, Miandad told Vengsarkar, ‘You have had a long career. There was only one thing missing: “b Waqar Younis”. You have now achieved that too.’Vengsarkar tried to ignore this taunt, but when needled further he told Miandad that he had just walked in to bat and didn’t see the ball properly. Miandad would have nothing of it, and kept on insisting that the kid was a terrific bowler. ‘He has done this to quite a few very good batsmen, so don’t feel so bad,’ Miandad said.After Miandad left, Vengsarkar conceded that Waqar was indeed a damn good bowler.Waqar was not the only young talent that emerged from those exhibition matches on that tour. The story of Tendulkar hitting Qadir out of the park is also quite well known, but I saw the best of Tendulkar in those matches when he played Wasim Akram. Perhaps Tendulkar played more freely on such occasions, considering these were not ODIs. Tendulkar versus Wasim with both at their prime is perhaps the best rivalry that never was. Those matches were not on TV, but from my ringside view I saw Tendulkar dominate Wasim. I remember how Mudassar Nazar observed during one such exhibition match – the best slog-overs bowler in the world was hit all over the park by Tendulkar quite effortlessly. Tendulkar will never boast openly, but he used to often wonder why other batsmen found Wasim so tough to play. I used to think, ‘Because you are not like other batsmen, Sachin.’Because Tendulkar had captured the imagination of the cricket world, and because I had had a good series, we would be recognized anywhere we went. I had seen a lot of Pakistan players wear a certain kind of sandal – especially Imran – and I had to buy them. So at the end of the tour, both of us went to a market in Peshawar. We reached a narrow street lined up on both sides with just sandal shops. As we looked in a few stores, word spread that we were there. The street soon filled up with hundreds of people, all gaping at us. I have mixed feelings about that experience. It was nice to see the effect we were having on people, and it was our first real experience of what it was like to be famous, but at the time I’d felt a little vulnerable because I had seen the hostility from Pakistan fans in Sharjah. Here, though, they just looked at us, two India cricketers, in awe. Nobody hassled us. I got my sandals, I liked them a lot, and I didn’t have to pay for them.Imperfect07:50:42 GMT, January 8, 2018: *The original said this incident was from Pakistan’s tour of England in 1990, which is incorrect

IPL breakthrough puts Prasidh Krishna in the big leagues

In less than a year’s time, the fast bowler has gone from the fringes of the Karnataka team to being counted among the brightest talents outside the national team

Shashank Kishore24-Aug-2018In January, Prasidh Krishna was just a net bowler trying to impress IPL talent scouts. Eight months on, he’s risen to the ranks of the 10 best fast bowlers outside the national team, mentored at India A by Rahul Dravid and Paras Mhambrey, who are at the helm of an excellent feeder system to the senior team. For this recognition, however, Prasidh has Kolkata Knight Riders to thank.Prasidh attended trials with three IPL teams earlier in the year, but none of them picked him at the auction. His first-class career hadn’t taken off – his lone appearance coming in September 2015 – and he had only played a handful of matches for Karnataka in the shorter formats. It seemed as if he would have to take a forced break after the Deodhar Trophy in March. However, there were a few who had their eyes on him.Abhishek Nayar, who would go on to mentor KKR’s domestic players, and Dinesh Karthik, the captain, put in a word with Venky Mysore, the CEO. The team’s performance analyst and lead talent scout AR Srikkanth too watched Prasidh bowl in the Vijay Hazare Trophy – where he was the tournament’s second-highest wicket-taker with 17 at an average of 16.52 in Karnataka’s title-winning run. A collective decision was taken to shortlist him for trials along with S Aravind, who has since retired and taken over as the state team’s bowling coach.At Eden Gardens, Prasidh and Aravind were inducted into KKR’s pre-tournament matches, sometimes two in a day, to gauge their level of preparedness.A week into the season, a place in the squad opened up for a fast bowler. Kamlesh Nagarkoti, fresh from a victorious Under-19 World Cup campaign and capable of bowling consistently over 140kph, was diagnosed with a foot injury. The franchise had to take a call on a replacement, and choose between a rookie and a tried-and-tested campaigner with a proven track record in T20 cricket with Karnataka and Royal Challengers Bangalore.KKR took a punt on Prasidh, and he finished as the second-highest wicket-taker among their fast bowlers, with 10 wickets in seven matches in a tournament where they made the playoffs. This was especially noteworthy since he had looked a “little under pressure” in his first two games against Mumbai Indians, finishing with combined figures of 8-0-80-1.”Wankhede is a deadly wicket,” Prasidh says, and nods with a laugh when prompted with a ‘paata’ response. His overall economy rate at the end of the season was 9.28 – expensive on the surface, but the best among his team’s fast bowlers – and KKR were happy with their return on investment. In fact, according to ESPNcricinfo’s calculations, Prasidh was among the five most impressive players in IPL 2018 in terms of their contribution in relation to their auction price.ESPNcricinfo LtdIt hadn’t been a straightforward decision for KKR to pick Prasidh over Aravind. In fact, Prasidh hadn’t looked particularly impressive in the pre-tournament games.”Kamlesh Nagarkoti was having a niggle just before the tournament started. I had called Prasidh and S Aravind from Bangalore to come and bowl in the nets,” Srikanth says. “Aravind was bowling really well; Prasidh went for a lot of runs. In one match, he bowled nine or 12 no-balls. But that may have been his off day, or something may have been not quite right with the ground or run-up. We also played at a different venue.”If we had to base him on that, he wouldn’t have been playing in the IPL or anywhere near where he is now. We saw that he had the potential: he could bowl a heavy ball, hit the good length, and hit the wicket hard. We thought we could nurture him, groom him, and if he was good, he would play the tournament this year. That’s how we picked him.”The move, in many ways, seems to have fast-tracked Prasidh’s career. In England, he was part of a victorious tri-series squad with India A. Now, he’s part of the India B squad in the quadrangular series also involving the A teams of Australia and South Africa. In the first game, he was India B’s best fast bowler, picking up four-wickets to set up a convincing win over South Africa A.As a fast bowler, Prasidh’s strength is his accuracy. He generally bowls in the high 130s, and is working on becoming faster without compromising on direction. “If you can bowl fast, then you can take pitches out of the equation,” he says. “That will also give me an edge. You start playing then on the batsman’s mind. Yes, I’m not the fastest bowler currently, but I believe I have the potential to get there.”Still only 22, there’s no reason to believe he can’t. Prasidh is a regular trainee at the MRF Pace Foundation, headed by Glenn McGrath, and has been to Australia on an exchange programme, where he trained under Jeff Thomson. It was this stint two years ago that taught him the importance of being bowling-fit and not just gym-fit.”The training methods there are different, the body structure is different. We had sessions on biomechanics, which I found interesting. Those helped me understand things like load-up, run-up, alignment better,” he says. “Also, I learnt that we can’t compare athletes from the two countries because we are built differently. Once you understand these aspects, it helps you understand your body better. I feel my interest in this has helped me take strides in my bowling too.”So far, Prasidh has had to contend with a lot of competition in Karnataka. A strong pace battery that includes Vinay Kumar, Abhimanyu Mithun and, until last season, Aravind has often left him no room to even make the squad, let alone the first team. This wait, Prasidh believes, has made him mentally tougher.”That has made me tougher as a bowler,” he says. “The wait for opportunities can be frustrating but it’s that suffocating competition that pushes me to work harder. I honestly didn’t expect all this to come my way so soon [IPL and India A] but I knew if I kept following the routines I have, I will get there sooner than later.”In his childhood, Prasidh wasn’t interested in watching cricket. A chance trip to the Chinnaswamy, where he watched Brett Lee bowl, fired him up. Last year, Lee, on duty as commentator in the Karnataka Premier League, took time off to chat with Prasidh after watching him bowl. Lee advised him to “not get ahead of himself”, and keep working hard.Prasidh has taken this advice seriously. “I don’t see why that should change. I always believe in the phrase ‘keep working hard, you never know when good things will come your way’.”

When in doubt, give the ball to James Anderson

India still had a lot of runs to get, but a miracle chase was being talked about when Joe Root recalled his main man. Once again, he delivered

George Dobell11-Sep-20181:46

‘What Jimmy has and can still achieve is astounding’ – Joe Root

It was, in the end, pretty much a microcosm of England in the field for much of the last decade.While England captains like to talk about the variety of options at their disposal and the importance of looking after their prize bowling assets, they eventually all do the same thing: throw the ball to James Anderson and let him do his thing.That was what happened here, anyway. Anderson, aged 36 and with more miles on the clock than any seamer in Test history (he has bowled more deliveries, anyway), was in the 14th over of a spell deep in the last session of the fifth day when he nipped one back through the gate (more of a chasm, really) of Mohammed Shami to wrap-up the match and the latest milestone. No seam bowler has taken as many wickets in the history of this great game.It was a typical performance, too. Having struck twice in his opening spell, Anderson was recalled to the attack when the game was in danger of slipping from England’s grasp. Two batsmen were set – the partnership was worth 149 when he was recalled – and Ben Stokes, Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid were all going at four an over; Stuart Broad wasn’t much better.So, with an old ball and on a flat surface, Anderson was called into the fray once more. The nip and zip of earlier had gone: the ball was nearly 70 overs old, after all, and any life in the surface was limited to turn out of the foot marks. It was, in many ways, an Asian-style pitch now.But his first four overs in the spell were maidens. That, against two men who had thumped 17 from the previous two overs and plundered 40 more from the five overs delivered at the other end. And eventually, with Anderson adding the control his team required, Adil Rashid was able to settle into a spell where he aimed at those foot marks and preyed on the fact the batsmen could now see the distant possibility of an historic win.The figures will show Anderson claimed only one wicket in that spell. That of a tailender, too. But the 13.3 overs he bowled contained nine maidens and saw only 12 runs scored off them. They cut off India’s runs and helped build pressure. They played an important role in the eventual result.Anderson went past McGrath with the final wicket of the series•ESPNcricinfo LtdBut who would that surprise? If you reflect on most of the highpoints of England’s Test history over the last decade – the Ashes win of 2010-11, victory in India in 2012, the Ashes win of 2013 – Anderson was a key part. And, just as at The Oval on Tuesday, it was a 13-over spell at Trent Bridge that sealed a 14-run win that went a long way towards deciding that 2013 series.Perhaps those two away series are particularly instructive, though. Anderson didn’t take a five-for in either of them. Yet he finished the 2010-11 Ashes as the leading wicket-taker on either side (he claimed 24 wickets at 26.04 apiece) and was hailed by MS Dhoni as “the difference between the sides” in India after claiming 12 wickets in the series. The next most successful seamer claimed four.Maybe, though, we learn more when we look at the failures rather than the successes. When England lost in the UAE in late 2015, for example, Anderson’s 13 wickets cost 16.61 apiece and he conceded 1.87 an over. When they lost the 2017-18 Ashes, his 17 wickets cost 27.82 apiece and he conceded 2.11 an over. And when they were thrashed 5-0 in 2013-14 and Anderson was clubbed for 28 in an over by George Bailey, he was one of the few left standing in an England attack that had fallen apart. The defeats weren’t because Anderson lacked effectiveness on those surfaces; they were because he lacked support.He’s not perfect. Even during this series, he squandered the new ball at Trent Bridge by bowling a fraction too short and there are times his hatred of conceding runs can lead to a slightly defensive approach. But the fact is, whether it is Nottingham or Nagpur, a green seamer or a lifeless pudding, there is nobody who offers their captain the control and reliability of Anderson.And here he is now, compensating for his diminishing pace with increased skill and remarkable fitness levels. If his captain, Joe Root, is right and Anderson is “at his best” now, he would surely be one of very few 36-year-old seamers in history to have managed it.”What Jimmy has achieved and what he is capable of still achieving is astounding,” Root said. “He’s probably bowling at his best. Throughout this summer, he’s been outstanding.”We have to do everything we can to prolong his career. Hopefully there’s still going to be a number of series where he’s leading the attack and terrorizing the batters.”The point of all this? Anderson is a more dangerous bowler in English conditions. Of course he is. But he is more valuable to England abroad. When nobody else can match his level of control. When his skills can’t be matched by Chris Woakes or Broad or anyone else. When he is required to plug the gap in England’s spin resources by providing the role of economical, pressure-building bowling.England captains keep talking about resting him. They keep talking about using him in shorter spells and they keep talking about the great options at their disposal. The truth is, though, that three in a row – Andrew Strauss, Alastair Cook and Root – have all come to rely heavily on Anderson and, even know, for all the years and all the miles, he remains as important as ever.

For the first time, India have a well-rounded pace attack

For the first time in their history, India have four bowlers of high ability, making for a formidable quick-bowling unit

Aakash Chopra06-Sep-20180:47

Agarkar: Pace bowling has been the big positive for India

Right from the days of Kapil Dev, India have had at least one world-class fast bowler in the playing XI. And each of those bowlers has had a bowler of high ability partnering them. Kapil had Manoj Prabhakar, Javagal Srinath had Venkatesh Prasad, and Zaheer Khan had Ajit Agarkar. And that leaves out a number of other decent fast bowlers. But none of those lead bowlers had the same quality of seam bowling from the other end as they themselves provided.They say that fast bowlers hunt in pairs, but India in the past have not had a pair quite as menacing as Wasim-Waqar, McGrath-Lee and Donald-Pollock. That’s where this current Indian team is different. They don’t have just one or two wicket-taking, match-winning bowlers but a proper pace quartet. It is an attack that takes 20 Test wickets outside the subcontinent on a regular basis. And the best bit isn’t just their efficiency but the different variations they bring to the table, despite all of them being right-arm bowlers.Jasprit Bumrah
The man with one of the most unorthodox actions has been the find of Indian cricket since 2016. Soon after his introduction to international cricket he became one of the best operators in white-ball cricket – ODIs and T20s alike.There were some reservations about his efficiency in Test cricket, for the length he bowled was ideal for limited-overs cricket but was considered a little too short for the longest form of the game. Also, when he first came on the scene, he would only bring the ball back in to right-handers, and that made him a little predictable.Bumrah has corrected those shortcomings remarkably well. First, he changed his wrist position at the point of release, which enabled him to not just make the ball hold its line but also to move it away from right-hand batsmen. Secondly, he has shown enough control to bowl a touch fuller without losing efficiency.His biggest strength is his ability to hit the deck hard, make the ball move sideways after pitching, and hit the bat hard and high. This is an asset when you play with the Kookaburra ball and when the ball or the pitch are worn out, for that’s when the release bowlers tend to struggle.Bumrah’s new-found ability to make the ball move both ways in the air has made him a viable option with the new ball, but he is best used with the older ball and in the second innings – more so because India’s other bowlers aren’t as effective in those conditions.Ishita Mazumder/ESPNcricinfo LtdBhuvneshwar Kumar
For every Bumrah, there needs to be a Bhuvneshwar at the other end: while you require someone to keep pushing the batsman backwards with extra pace and disconcerting bounce, you could also do with someone who drags the batsman forward by pitching the ball fuller and swinging it.Bhuvneshwar is a typical release bowler who relies on lateral movement in the air. Since he isn’t hitting the deck hard, the movement off the surface is either negligible or easily negotiated. His strength is the wrist behind the ball, which in turn allows him to release it with the seam bolt upright – but facing either fine leg or first slip when he needs it to.Bhuvneshwar is the toughest bowler to play with the new Kookaburra, and with the Dukes when the conditions are ripe for swing bowling. He bowls from close to the stumps and so maintains a fourth-or-fifth-stump line that isn’t easy to either leave or play.He does lose a little bit of his sting when the ball gets old, and in the second innings of Tests, but that’s where others need to step up.Ishant Sharma
Ishant’s biggest strength is the extra bounce he generates after pitching, courtesy his height and his high-arm action. Since he established control over his wrist, he has been able to swing the ball back in to right-hand batsmen too. Earlier he used to be your typical second-innings old-ball kind of bowler, but now he’s equally effective with the new ball – especially against left-handers, for the angle at which he bowls (when he goes round the stumps) makes the batsman feel that the ball is coming in, but often it holds its line or goes away slightly. It’s not a coincidence that Ishant has dismissed left-handers as many times as he has done in the England series.He is also someone who could be efficiently used if you’re planning a bouncer trap from either over or round the stumps. There aren’t too many bowlers who are equipped to bowl to the field set for a bouncer trap, but Ishant is one such.Also, it must be noted that he has what it takes to succeed even with the Kookaburra ball.Mohammed Shami
He’s one of the most gifted bowlers in the current set-up, and has a number of things going in his favour. His wrist position, the backspin he imparts on the ball, and the seam position are perfectly aligned to make the ball move late in the air. And it’s not just the movement in the air that troubles the batsman, for Shami can make the ball move laterally after pitching too.Mohammed Shami is perhaps the most naturally gifted of India’s current crop of fast bowlers•Getty ImagesThere’s a subtle difference between the cutters that most fast bowlers bowl (by imparting pressure with the index or middle finger at the point of release) and the way Shami extracts movement off the surface. His method doesn’t make the seam scramble, and if the seam isn’t wobbling, the absence of visual cues means the batsman has less chance of preparing for exaggerated sideways movement after pitching.Shami’s pace is ideal for swing bowling but he isn’t your typical release bowler, for he can be equally effective with the old ball.Last but not least, he’s your man when the ball starts reverse-swinging, for his high-arm action and pace in the air make the ball tail in or move away very late.He does need to be more disciplined if he is to realise his potential, though.While there are a lot of things going in favour of this pace quartet, there’s one thing that needs improving, they need to get better at getting rid of lower-order batsmen. It’s obvious that they are capable of asking probing questions to the best of batsmen across the world, but it’s also evident that they are yet to master the skill of dismissing the lower order. Perhaps that’s their next challenge.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus